I posted this in another thread:
I can’t get her whole dissertation without using Interlibrary Loan, but the preview pages appear to be the same as the cited document. I converted it to Word and ran a spelling check. I find a few typos (slcoholism, liason), which is better than most major news sources these days. There’s some variability in her use of hyphenation, though I don’t know which academic stylebook was required. Similarly, she uses “&” in an occurrence of the school’s name and “and” for the same later. I see a misplaced figure (repeated on the next line; from context it’s clear it’s a typo). I see a few places where she might have used the wrong word, or might be using her profession’s jargon. There are some infelicities of expression. I’m not going to go through the numbers. On the whole, the writing is fine and organized coherently, and significantly better than many of the theses, dissertations, submitted manuscripts, and professional publications I routinely read or edit.
As to content, while not sparkly, it serves the need it was intended to address and probably actually helped underserved people, which is more than I can say of Tucker Carlson’s oeuvre.
From a covfefe/hamberder perspective, it’s golden.
ETA to the above: It’s a typo (undeserved for underserved) that wouldn’t be caught by spellcheck.