…
Carlson, who snidely compared Biden to “Dr. Pepper” and “Dr. Bill Cosby” earlier this week, tore apart the 2006 academic paper that presumably earned her a doctorate in education from University of Delaware.
…
Carlson also gleefully pointed out mathematical errors in her paper, a purported copy of which can be seen here.
…
My bold.
I’m guessing at the time of this article, the copy Tucker linked to had not been verified or debunked as the actual dissertation.
Now, how does this affect various people’s stance on Section 230? If Trump gets his way and Section 230 is removed / voided / whatevered, you will see Parler’s rules change SO FAST, once they know they’re on the hook for what people say and do on their platform. "We can be prosecuted? Screw free speech! "
A Wyoming state legislator welcomed the naming of the state’s first black county sheriff by emailing him a gif from Blazing Saddles with the caption, “Where the white women at?”
Illiterate (if that were even the case): Bad. Speech Plagiarizer: A-OK.
And literacy is not an issue if a Republican so-called president struggles with it.
More likely he’s never seen Blazing Saddles. Comedy is hard work for the intellectually-challenged; they tend to stick to Michael Bay movies and Red Dawn.
Anti-black GIFS abound on the sort of social media this Wyoming specimen probably peruses (and GIFS that are anti-gay and anti-uppity-female and anti-most other people, too).
So the odds are that he had seen the GIF at one time and thought, yeah, just the thing to pull out if some black man tries to get above his station…
Conservatives as a whole seem to have trouble with subtext. Just look at cops adopting the Punisher logo or the playlist at Loser Donald’s rallies, or the way they think Rorschach is a hero and not a psychopath, or believing Jesus was a fan of free-market capitalism.