An old friend from highschool annoyed the hell out of me last week with this antifa–>white house nonsense. He called it “very enlightening”, a bunch of his buddies replied “wow” “interesting” “makes sense” and “hmmm…”
I called him out on it, pointed out that whatever numbnuts owns antifa . com can redirect it wherever he wants. He says he knows that, but he thought it was funny, and why am I making such a big deal about it?
I realize that TLDs are not meaningful, but I doubt “antifa”, if it really existed, would use a dot-com address.
Yes, it is fucking stupid when they get upset that a painting depicting a metaphorical scene is “not real”
OF course it’s not real, you stupid cow. It depicts Biden’s first days when he is dealing with a country in crisis that he inherited from his moron predecessor.
She thinks it’s a photograph? She thinks it is supposed to represent the ACTUAL PHYSICAL state of affairs? She’s stupid, and eats stupid food for breakfast.
And you’re not far behind.
Fucking pervert probably wants to have his official “genital inspection badge” so he can emulate his hero and grab pussy whenever he wants.
Does that mean that Manwich eats stupid food for lunch?
Of high schoolers…
I’m glad I’m not the only one who remembers that post. It’s one of the few memes here that’s not been overused to the point of annoyance.
No that’s her job she says what the audience wants. If she thinks that far.
A lot of people don’t really consider what is true to be important, they use words for effect.
It’s more evil because they are pretending for clout.
I remember it as Stupid Flakes.
No, it was “eats stupid food for breakfast”. See the first post here.
In Soviet America, stupid food eat Manwich for lunch!
When he was 15, Josh Hawley wrote a column defending the Oklahoma City bomber.
Did a whois lookup on that address
Registered almost two decades ago, long, long before “antifa” would have had any meaning in public consciousness. Undiscoverable owner at a Panama City PO Box, using a phone with Minnesota area code, with a fax machine that appears to be in Peru.
So, yeah, quite fake.
Oh, please. We’re gonna hold people accountable for things they said when they were 15 now? That’s when you’re trying to figure out how the world works. One minute you’re a communist and the next you’re a Randian objectivist.
If they have the same views when they’re 41, I don’t see why not.
Panama??? @Colibri??? 
This isn’t about “canceling” a decent adult for a bit of youthful folly in his teen years a quarter-century ago. This is about pointing out that this particular adult with shitty views today had similarly shitty views a quarter-century ago.
In fact, I’d say that 15-year-old Hawley comes across as slightly more rational and mature than present-day Hawley. At least back then he knew that antigovernment militias were prone to bullshit conspiracy theories. Now he’s just pouring gasoline on the flames of bullshit conspiracy theories to induce their promoters to vote for him.
(Moreover, I think that something a 15-year-old voluntarily publishes in their hometown newspaper as a public comment on political issues is fair game to consider as part of their adult politician persona. We’re not stealing and data-dumping the kid’s high school diaries or yearbook inscriptions here; we’re merely reading something he deliberately wrote for the public press, like a grown-up, for all the world to see.)
Speaking of “stupid shit you wrote as a teenager”, I authored that “stupid food” post when I was 16 and am pretty appalled that people somehow still remember it. Just know I am fondly anticipating the day the SDMB goes offline and everything I wrote from ages 15-19 can finally be swallowed back into the earth, where it belongs.
Regards,
FlyingRamenMonster, awakened from her slumber by an email notification
And if you read further in, the bill does not say anything about examining potentially transmen/boys to see if they actually have a dangly.
It’s only the women they’re worried about.
Frankly, this smells like an attempt to make sexual assault of a minor legal.