Is Ben still obnoxious at 19, or has he learned anything in the meantime.
I haven’t seen him in years, but as far as I know we both ended up relatively normal individuals
The domain’s owner could be a domain squatter (aka cybersquatter). Part of the “business” is registering as many short-and-snappy nonsense words as possible.
On the other hand, “antifa” as a reference to anti-fascist belief existed in Germany by 1990, at least, and was appropriated by Americans sometime later:
and
If the wikipedia article is correct about “2007,” and the domain-owner is associated with the USA, that would lend credence to the idea that the domain was registered as part of a bunch of nonsense-words (which would explain the “dot com” choice).
The IOC may be corrupt as hell, but I doubt they’re Florida corrupt.
Brandon Straka, the idiot who claimed to be an ex-liberal who started the “walk away” movement and who was banned from flying because of his refusal to wear a mask, has been arrested for the takeover of the Capitol.
I imagine the “reasoning” is that a genetic female playing against boys doesn’t have the same physical advantage that a genetic boy playing against girls would have.
But according to the same “reasoning”, a transgender boy playing against cisgender boys is so weak and fragile that he might get seriously hurt, so he needs to be excluded for his own protection and shielding the school from liability!
(Couldn’t bring myself to reproduce that “reasoning” to the extent of misgendering this hypothetical transgender boy with the feminine pronouns that these folks would certainly have used for him.)
But yeah, it’s pretty apparent that it’s only the girls’ genitalia they’ll insist on visually inspecting.
This is Russian disinformation
A Russian disinformation outlet did the exact same fucking thing this summer, except they linked antifa.com to Biden’s campaign website. The address antifa.com was registered in the Russian Federation until sometime last year, when it was moved to Panama. No other information on the ownership is available.
Many reporters did note with alarm that Chanel Rion of OANN asked about the antifa.com redirect at a WH press briefing about two hours after it happened, casting further suspicion on OANN’s connections with Russian disinformation.
This ties into the larger QANON / OANN Russian disinformation scheme. I posted this in another thread. This article contains a wonderland of links on the subject, including the one above.
They really aren’t upset about girls ‘pretending’ to be boys (apologies for any offense). So he is presumably looking for an opportunity to grab dick.
I believe there will be opportunities for each “inspector” to follow his own proclivities.
I bet @DemonTree is over the moon at this news
Can you point me to the part of the bill that mentions genital inspections, please?
The article doesn’t make the claim that it does. In fact, it specifically points out that:
Steube’s 2021 bill does not say how state and local sports governing bodies should define or check a student athlete’s “reproductive biology and genetics at birth”; all the bill does is threaten their federal funding if they don’t
The actual bill is here (two-page PDF warning). It says
1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.
2 Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972
3 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the
4 following:
5 ‘‘(d)(1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for
6 a recipient of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or
7 facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a per
8 son whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program
9 or activity that is designated for women or girls.
10 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be rec
11 ognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology
12 and genetics at birth.’’.

Can you point me to the part of the bill that mentions genital inspections, please?
Oh sure - now you’re interested in the exact wording of legal statements.
I always assume that if someone was actually interested, then they would’ve looked it up for themselves.
But if they’re playing partisan games, they’ll make you look it up, so they can nitpick your results to feel better about “their side”.
jUsT AsKiNg QuEsTiOnS.
Kellyanne Conway’s twitter account apparently posted one or more topless pictures of her 16-y/o daughter Claudia (they do seem to be at odds most of the time, but, fucking come on).
Isn’t that like a felony?

I always assume that if someone was actually interested, then they would’ve looked it up for themselves.
I couldn’t see anything about genital inspections in the bill, but I’m sure you’re all much too smart to be taken in by fake news. I expect someone will find it any minute now…