I had a book when I was a kid (Mud Pies and Other Recipes?) that had a chapter on hors d’ouevres, and my mom told me how to say it. I was a pretty high-falutin’ kid.
I was embarrassing-years-old when I figured out that the word I’d been reading (and pronouncing wrong in my head) were the snack type foods people had been offering me at social functions. I don’t remember for sure when the light turned on, it may have been at a restaurant that had a menu section for them.
In today’s Stupid Idea, how about “Let’s lie about something ridiculously easy to disprove”?
She said: “I haven’t had any other contact with Liz Cheney. She made the one effort and all she said was ‘Hello, Harriet.’ And then that was the end of it.”
Hageman repeated her claim that Cheney did not concede and her spokesperson provided Politico with a video of a phone playing a message apparently from Cheney. The website reported: “The message as played on-screen contains only Cheney’s two-word greeting before sound cuts off for more than 10 more seconds.”
Lie about it, post obviously altered version of it, get called on it.
Myself, I knew they were called “orderves” - my parents were fairly classy people - it’s just that I was way too old when I realized that they and the “hors d’oeuvres” I had read about in books were one and the same.
I’ve been a foodie for awhile and I used crudités with an acquaintance when I was talking about an event that was coming up. Boy howdy, she gave me so much flack about it that I’ve never used it again.
She told me that she didn’t know what that word meant and it was rude for me to use a word like that.
When I moved up here from L.A., a Mexican restaurant in Bellingham had TV commercials. The voiceover was done by what sounded like a college student. She wasn’t full-on Valley Girl, as she wasn’t even born then; but I think you know the ‘young pretty girl’ accent. Anyway, she was touting the restaurant’s arroz con camarones – which she pronounced arrows con camma-ronies.
Projection yet again. “Well, I wouldn’t have conceded a defeat without innumerable recounts so she wouldn’t have, either. I just didn’t get a clean recording.”
It didn’t appear in the above post. This guy said that Merrick Garland should be executed, and later, when asked what he meant, said he “was just being facetious”.
So all Rick Scott claimed was that job seekers who hired on with the IRS would end up losing those jobs?
He didn’t add that those hired could expect, in the GOP-triumphant world that will exist post-November 8, to be prosecuted, deported, or at least audited?
What a lapse. Clearly Rick Scott lacks every quality the Republican Party seeks in its Presidential candidates.