Done. 'Cause really they all suck.
I have to give credit to the writers of this season of The 2020s. Who knew that this throw-away from a couple months ago would end up being a big plot twist in the finale?
Kanye’s mother-in-law wants a former Twitter executive prosecuted for depriving the American people of their sacred and inalienable right to see Hunter Biden’s dick pics.
“Treason” is the new “Commie.”
Loser Donald calls for the “termination” of the Constitution so he can be the winner of the 2020 election.
Reminds me of Thomas More’s speech to Richard Rich.
And not even for Wales (if we’re thinking of the same speech). His remarks to William Roper also come to mind.
So… To be clear:
Trump believes that because a social media site did not allow pornographic pictures of his opponent’s son to be broadcast all over the internet, this logically means that the constitution of the United States is therefore null and void.
Not an exaggeration.
Well, Hunter’s thong did have that gold fringe…
He doesn’t even know what’s in the Constitution, despite the best efforts of aides to teach him.
The Constitution is for suckers and losers.
/s
It’s very long, and no one really ever read the whole thing. Did you know it had 27 amendments? Not many people know that.
“Abraham Lincoln never read it, and he was almost as great a president as I was.”
Yeah, you got it, but I think he said something like “but for Wales???”
It makes sense if you start with the premise that “seeing Hunter’s luscious hog” was the X-factor that would have convinced tens of millions of Biden supporters to change their votes.
If Hunter Biden broke the law, hold him accountable. (See, Republicans, it’s easy!)
But what they’ve got is dick picks? Let me know if there’s something there that would be devastating if a politician did it. For example, cheating on one’s spouse and paying off the porn star one was cheating with.
What do you mean Trump did that and it was not devastating?? Have Republicans no morals at all??
(faints…)
He likes constitutions with only 26 amendments.
It’s after Richard Rich gives perjured testimony in More’s trial for treason. More notices that Rich now wears a chain of office with a red dragon, and asks what it signifies; the answer is that Rich is now a Crown official (Chief Justice?) for Wales.
Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world… but for Wales?
The other exchange I mentioned:
William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!
More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!
One of the two quotes (the other being Pastor Niemoller’s) that I feel certain people should have tattooed on the insides of their eyelids.
Rapidly approaching time for a conservatorship. I’m nominating Hillary if not Yeezy. Barring that, a nice padded bunk at Club Fed, Lompoc, CA.
And yet Alex Jones is still feeding Kanye by talking about a Jewish Mafia and giving him a platform. So.