A BBC Panorama investigation has revealed that Trump supporters have been creating and sharing super creepy AI pictures of Trump posing with non-existent Black people. This is not a weird, unexpected mistake created by an algorithm, this is actual people using AI to create these images
Creepy isn’t even the word for it…
MAGAts: "Democrat Party claims “Black people ‘don’t exist’!”
Really? That seemed like a great time and place for a selfie, you twit? Right next to Alex Jones? It’s certainly indicative of the level of legal representation Trump brings into work for him:
As mentioned before, the guy with three fingers on the left is creepy. Ad I can’t not see it!
Plus, I see two hats and a shirt with “writing” on them. None of it appears to contain any actual words. Also, I’m not convinced the red hat (on his left) is actually a hat. She also appears to have a case of vitiligo but only where his hand is. And looking closer, both of the women next to him are wearing earrings that appear to be hovering just below their ears.
On the plus side, the woman on his right, in the blue top, looks like she’s about to sucker punch him.
Loser Donald apparently just found out that his lawyers have been telling the court he can’t afford to pay his bond, because his ego has sent him running to Fox News to sabotage his own case.
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/trump-directly-contradicts-his-lawyers-ny-filings
The Trumpites may be aware that a massive lawsuit from the Christian Louboutin company is on the horizon. That company holds the trademark on the red soles sported by the Trump trash-shoes.
So we may see prices drop even further. And it’s quite possible that each and every buyer will have to swallow the excuse ‘we can’t deliver them due to an ongoing lawsuit, so please consider your purchase a donation to Your Lord.’
I wondered about the red soles…
I have a pair of red-soled sneakers, not Louboutins (or Trumps). Should I be suing somebody?
Wait, why would you sue?
Okay, I won’t.
Let’s start with that the article is just quoting commentators floating the idea that there may be such a lawsuit, basing themselves on other prior suits in other countries. But it contains no expression from Louboutin about this.
A suit would have to argue that this is creating confusion about the branding of the shoe or participation of the company in its production or marketing, or having a deleterious effect on the legit product’s market wouldn’t it?
How could she, with such a shriveled forearm and minuscule hand?
Look who’s begging (presumably like a dog) for Daddy Elmo’s money?
The shirt is more legible if I take it to be Cyrillic… which fits…
That’s a good point and, IIRC, a problem the right has had in the past on a few other occasions.
Cyrillic also appears to be on the baseball cap of the guy in top left.
To some extent. A lot of the time, it’s really about publicly showing one is taking active measures to protect one’s brand, which is a condition of maintaining a trademark.
If they didn’t take at least some action, even if of the ‘sternly worded letter’ or ‘public acknowledgement no reasonable person could confuse them’ variety, that can be taken as a sign they aren’t really maintaining their trademark and, if enough similar cases crop up, eventually to the argument they have abandoned their trademark.
It is easier/safer for them to at least make some noises about it, or at least that what their lawyers should be telling them.
«цотеж» ? Not a word, TBMK.