NEW Stupid Republican Idea of the Day (Part 3)

There’s also a number of non-voting folks who had their registration removed without notification for signature and name matching, their polling place moved or closed, or had the state legislature decide to remove entire categories from voting eligibility.

Can someone spell out those damned acronyms?

I think the first is Does Not Give A Flying Fk
And I think the second is Give A F
k. I could be wrong, but that’s my guess.

Yes, someone who doesn’t give a fuck is synonymous with someone who’s fine with Trump. I’m not sure what part of that is disputable.

Thanks, but we’re all grown-ups here. There’s no reason not to spell out the word. (Fuck for anyone else who was confused.)

Wow, it does. He starts being handsy, she brushes him off a couple times then he goes full boob grab and that’s fine. A sec later she grabs his crotch. During a touring Broadway show. It’s quite something.

Boebert apologized, citing her difficult divorce. :roll_eyes:

Translation: “Fuck. There’s video.”

Stick a fork in her, she’s done. She has broken the Second Law of Modern Republicanism.

She apologized.

I’d like to know more the source for those vids.

Do theaters have IR security cameras watching everyone in the audience these days? Were these folks recognizable enough celebs that somebody trained a camera on them specifically? Was that some customer’s mobile recording or something built into the building? etc.

From the angle and apparent distance, I’d say ceiling or wall camera.

Are you questioning the veracity/provenance ? It looks very much like already released video from that night – same look, same angle. I have no trouble believing it’s from that same camera.

Not questioning the veracity at all.

I’d just like to know if I can count on being covertly observed recorded in the next dark theater I attend. I’m no celeb, but I don’t much favor being routinely recorded in places with if not exactly an expectation of privacy, at least an expectation of non-observation.

The governor of South Dakota tells us that marriage is between one man and one woman, and one other man and cuckoldry lies at the heart of family values.

OK, she did not actually say that, and denies schtupping that Lewandowski guy, despite substantial evidence. Which seems to suggest that “family values” means “dude, whatever”.

“Family values” is code for “Your family should live by the values I tell them to”.

Always has meant that and nothing else.

And these days I think it’s more common for cameras to have IR/Night Vision than to not have it.

I am pretty sure her actions matched her values to a t.

This story has been kicking around for a while now, although the Daily Mail now claims to have receipts. But it first surfaced in a Trump propaganda site called American Greatness, almost two years ago. I hate them, but I have to grudgingly give them props for the title.

This story broke around the time Lewandowski was arrested for harassing and assaulting Trashelle Odum, the wife of a donor at a campaign event at a Las Vegas Benihana. He pled out to a deal that included counseling, fines and community service.

Trump also promised the donor, the husband of the woman that was assaulted, that he’d kick Lewandowski out of MAGA World. He lied, Trump took him back after a couple of months.

This was not the first time that Lewandowski was arrested and charged with misdemeanor battery after assaulting a woman at a Trump campaign event. In 2016 he was charged with assaulting Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields.

It wasn’t even the second time that a woman called the cops after Lewandowski assaulted her at a campaign event. In 2017 a singer and MAGA acolyte named Joy Villa filed a police report claiming he assaulted her at a campaign event, although it’s not clear what action the police took.

Lewandowski has also been romantically linked to Hope Hicks.

And he’s been married the whole time.

Or “We only value certain families.” One’s that don’t look like “problematic” Cheerios advertising.

From Season 2 of “Galavant”:

Galavant: So, the butcher gets a vote?
Peasant John: Yep!
King Richard: The baker gets a vote?

John: Yep, and everyone who couldn’t vote before!

Peasant #1: Except of course the women
Peasant #2: And we won’t let him or him in
John: We mean everybody else
Peasant #3: Except the poor!

John: Then we vote on every pressing public question
Either-
Peasants: Yay!
John: Or-
Peasants: Nay!
John: Everybody gets to choose
Peasant #2: Except the you know whos
John + Peasants: As we build a new tomorrow here today!

John: If you’d like to make a statement or suggestion
Simply stand
Peasant #4: Oh!
John: And hey!
Peasant #4: Every person counts the same
Peasant #1: Except of course the lame
Peasant #2: …and the lepers!
Peasant #3: …and the gingers!
Peasant #4: …and the witches!
Peasant #5: …and the heathens!
Peasant #6: …and the bastards!
Peasant #7: …and the gypsies!
Peasant #8: …and the commies!
Peasant #2: …and the hippies!
Peasants: As we build a new tomorrow!
Peasant John: A fair and square tomorrow!
Peasants: A 'morrow where tomorrow live today!

So we all would march together towards the future
John: Well not all per se
Just the ones who look like me
Peasants: It’s called democracy!
Peasant #8: The landed!
Peasant #3: …and the wealthy!
Peasant #5: …and the pious!
Peasant #7: …and the healthy!
Peasant #1: …and the straight ones!
Peasant #2: …and the pale ones!
Peasant #1: …and we only mean the male ones!
John: If you’re all of the above, then you’re ok!
John + Peasants: As we build a new tomorrow here today!

Such a good show.