NFL Predictions - Week Six and still going strong!

Hmmm, 9-5 last week, 52-20 overall. Compare that to the tops at sportingnews.com (50-22) and maybe I’ll start using these picks for all my betting needs.

Here we go again:

Packers 13 at Lions 19 (The Pack can’t seem to win at home this year, now you want to put them in a dome?)

Bills 13 at Dolphins 6 (Two tough defenses battle it out. Give it to the one with the better offense. I might change this depending on the injury status of Zach and Thurman Thomas [no relation].)

Saints 20 at Bears 24 (I think I figured it out!! The Saints have such a high rated defense because their special teams keep letting the opponent start 50 yards from the goaline.)

Steelers 16 at Jets 23 (The Steelers finally get things going, in spite of Plaxico Burress. If they weren’t playing the gritty J-E-T-S, I’d pick them to win.)

Titans 30 at Benagals 6 (Look! The Begals have the lead! No, really, LOOK! Ohhh, too late, it’s gone.)

Colts 31 at Ptriots 17 (What? The Patriots won? Well, I guess to reach my original projection of 4-12 it had to happen sooner or later.)

Redskins 17 at Eagles 24 (Stat o’ the Week - of the three teams tied for first in the division (Iggles, 'Skins, Giants), the Eagles have scored 33 more points and allowed 12 less than either of the others.)

Giants 24 at Falcons 13 (I swear someone was spouting off a couple of weeks ago about the Falcon defense coming around – 159 points allowed, tied for worst in the league. :wink: )

Broncos 23 at Chargers 12 (Holy cow! The Chargers scored 31 points! They gave up 57 though. I think the Broncos will give a little more effort than the Rams Ole’ defense. Note to Ryan Leaf: Start sucking up to Denny Green [see below].)

Raiders 30 at 49ers 24 (Well, stuffinb I’ll give them another win on the year, but not this one. They still look like they’re a couple of blocks away from “turning the corner” - they’re the one’s tied with the Falcons [see above].)

Seahawks 17 Panthers 23 (At first I thought this was going to be a tough one to pick, then I saw that Holmgren has benched Kitna in favor of Huard.)

Browns 17 at Cardinals 20 (Hey, Jake - just toss it up to the tall, fast guy – yeah him, David Boston. That’s how they do it in Minnesota anyway.)

Ravens 24 at Jaguars 16 (Let’s see. Suspect offensive line. Aggressive, attacking defense. Injury prone QB and RB. Fred Taylor would be wise to just start sitting out games now and forego the pain of an actual injury.)

Bucaneers 16 at Vikings 24 (Apparently any QB who can get the ball within 15 yards of Randy Moss can succeed in this offense. Until he gives me reason otherwise, from now on I’m just going to refer to Keyshawn as “the rich decoy.”)

Rams 108 at BYE 24 (Yep, even without an opponent they give up 24 points. Whoever came up with that “defense wins championships” line might want to double check their arithmetic, though. Rams Defensive Philosphy = “Oh, just let 'em score. I want to see what Warner will do next.”)

Well according to America’s Line (apparently betting can be patriotic), I’ve picked 4 upsets. I see a four game parlay in my future!

As always, you comments are welcomed.

Well, you’re wrong about the Giants game.

See, I go to one Giants game a year. Have done so the past four years.

We are 0-4 in those games.

And I will be at the Giant-Falcon game this week.

You all know where to place your wagers, and I’d like a cut of the winnings, if at all possible.


Yer pal,
Satan - Commissioner, The Teeming Minions

I HAVE BEEN SMOKE-FREE FOR:
Five months, three weeks, five days, 17 hours, 7 minutes and 52 seconds.
7188 cigarettes not smoked, saving $898.57.
Extra life with Drain Bead: 3 weeks, 3 days, 23 hours, 0 minutes.

Fine another doubter:mad:, I formally request a public apology and acknowledgement of my superior prognostication skills when you’re wrong. :cool:

Course if I’m wrong, I’m going to deny making any such prediction in the first place :wink:

Oh yeah, and Im taking the Dolphins over the Bills

Gazoo -

You run a weekly football pick thread, while I am in first place in the Straight Dope’s Pro Football Pick 'Em League on Yahoo?

The impudence.

Now kiss my ring.

satan - See, you’re due to see them win!

stuffinb - I admit that I’m more of a believer than I was before the season started, but that defense…sheesh!

As for the ‘Phins (personally my favorite team since I was 4 years old which happens to coincide with 1972), I think it can go either way. Two things concern me. First, they absolutely need Zach Thomas in order to stop the run, witness the yards the freakin’ Bungles were able to get on the ground last week. Second, everytime in recent years they get off to a good start they fall apart and lose 2-3 in a row and I just have a feeling that Buffalo will be the team to start the slide. I hope I’m wrong, but I just see them blowing it.

milo - Hey, how else am I gonna kill a couple hours on Thursday afternoon? Working? :eek:

Yeah the defense still has some problems, but they’re getting less by the game. The pass coverage in the Cardinals game was the best I’d seen so far this year, and kept Plummer from going downfield too much. But still there’s that chance for the rookie mistakes back there.

Also, I think part of it’s just statistics, it takes some time to recover from the St. Louis beating, which really skewed the numbers.

Well I’ll just have to wait, our due is coming.

Still think the Eagles can pull off a victory without Duce Staley?

Yeah, I’ve been figuring on him being out since the beginning of the week. Brian Mitchell will be pumped to play against his former team, and Duce really hasn’t been that great since his Week One explosion. The Eagles defense and special teams should do well enough to allow the offense to pull it off.

Hey Drain Bead, I just read on http://www.thehuddle.com that Staley may be out for the season now. Glad he’s not on any of my fantasy footabll squads!

Based on this quote I officially submit the stuffinb may actually be Denny Green.

Any word on who’s QBing for the Bucs? I can’t find injury reports online, and I didn’t get to buy a paper today (should’ve stolen the neighbor’s, dammit!). 'Cause I want to pick them for the office pool, but if Shaun King is at the helm, Viks it is.

I vote for the Redsox to win the Superbowl. :slight_smile: Or if they are lucky perhaps the Wizards. I suppose this means I will probably have to watch a non-gymnastics, non-diving, or non-figure-skating televised sports competition now. I hope the Redsox win. :wink: Well, not really as I hate any sport that is not one of the three listed above.

HUGS!
Sqrl

PS. I don’t know if those are really football teams above or not, they were just some of the only ones that I could think of off hand.

From espn.com:

I haven’t heard anything that would lead me to believe anyone but King will be the Bucs starter either.

i asked you before to keep quiet about the vikings

shhhhhh

no talking

nothing there to see

move along now

it’s really not the end of their season if the bucs lose.

really

no need to get all het up about it

shoo

go 'way

thanks

Well i will admit that there’s a slight resemblance but, …
:wink:

Redskins will be up by 28 points in the final 5 minutes of the 4th quarter. Then Bruce Smith will knock the ball out of McNabb’s hands and an Eagles offensive lineman will pick it up and run 80 yds for a TD. Then the eagles will recover 3 onsides kicks in a row and score immediately putting the game into overtime. In overtime Brian Mitchell will kneel down on the one yardline on the opening kickoff. On the next play he will break through the line for a 98 yard run only to fumble the ball into the endzone due to his celebrating before completing the play. Redskins take the ball at the 20. Then the 2 overtime periods continue without an ounce of excitement and the game ends in a 28-28 tie.

At least that is my prediction…

If that doesn’t happen I predict either the Eagles or Redskins will win. The only other possibility is the game is cancelled due to inclement weather, nuclear war, or a terrorist action.

I’d just like to point out that Rams defense held them to 17 points until the score was 50-17 in the 4th quarter and Warner was out of the game. The game was well out of reach when the Chargers added on 14 stat-padding points. The Rams did the same thing when they beat up on the Vikings in the playoffs last year.

Just a little good natured ribbing there Crunchy Frog. But three things here: (a) You have to admit that they’re defense hasn’t exactly shined this year, (b) Even 17 points to the hapless offense of the Chargers is a lot, and © What does the fact that Warner wasn’t in the game any longer have to with the defense giving up 14 more points?

Gazoo says:

a) Yes, the defense has been lax, to say the least.

b) Yes, especially considering the Chargers scored those 17 points (IIRC, they had only scored 3 offensive TDs before that game).

c) I know Warner was pulled, so defensive starters were probably also pulled once the lead reach such an imbalance. The bench players can be a little more easily forgiven than the starters for giving up meaningless points.

What’s a Keyshawn?