I kind of want a picture of Ayatollah Khomeini wearing a Ginsberg collar, but I also don’t want a fatwah against me.

I kind of want a picture of Ayatollah Khomeini wearing a Ginsberg collar, but I also don’t want a fatwah against me.
He’s flailing even more than normal (a high bar to begin with considering the number of limbs) because @JohnT has cut him to the quick with that analysis. Well done to him.
Either that or trying to hide in a cloud of his own ink.
Either that or trying to hide in a cloud of his own ink.
Salmon Rushdie just got ‘consequenced’ as your side loves to threaten and the consequencer wasn’t wearing a glorious MAGA hat.
Weak troll there troll.
(And if he had been wearing a MAGA hat you’d . . . change the subject.)
It’s not about the MAGA we wear on our heads, but the MAGA we wear in our hearts.
‘Make Allah Great Again!’
Salmon Rushdie just got ‘consequenced’ as your side loves to threaten and the consequencer wasn’t wearing a glorious MAGA hat.
You think a liberal stabbed Rushdie? For an octopus, you barely break the water surface when you deep dive. The only part you got right was Rushdie got stabbed. You’re completely ignorant of the fatwa that was issued from Iran. No wonder nobody takes your opinions seriously.
No, he knows the facts. Allow me to translate – I speak moron.
Conservatives are under attack! Conservative speech, that is. From Twitter bans to… YouTube bans, to… well that’s pretty much it really, conservatives are getting “cancelled” left and right by “wokeism.” “Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences,” liberals will say. And now here’s Salmon Rushdie [sic], a champion of free speech adored by conservatives, who’s met face first (too soon?) with the consequences liberals “love to threaten” conservatives with. Are we happy now? ARE WE? And we can’t even blame Trump like we love to do. Checkmate, libtards.
It’s a silly argument because at no point do liberals consider getting stabbed in the face a valid, or even expected, consequence of speech. Also, it’s not like The Satanic Verses is in the same ballpark as someone going on a racist twitter rant.
Think I got it.
"The violent Left, so incessant in their need to destroy all that is America, has finally, finally, inspired a person of the Islamic faith… a religion well-loved among the American Right for its pacifism… to attack another human being.
“Therefore, seeing a Moslem act as such demonstrates the violence inherent in Marxism.”
I’ve seen DNA molecules less twisted.
We need a RWNJ / Octopus de-tangler article along the lines of this oldie -
Of which the following applies to the object of this thread -
- Cynics will now object: any birdbrain knows the way to prevent a rope, cord, etc., from tangling is to coil it and then cinch the coils (or, per Raymer and Smith, put the coiled rope in a small container) before storage. True, but the world is full of birdbrains.
So let’s coil up Octo’s many tendrils, gently and carefully, cinch them, and toss them in a small container, and store away, never to be seen again. That’s what they mean by “Lock [them] up!”, right? Safe storage of tangled messes?
I think Octopus’s logic system works like this:
How does this fit in?
mobs of Biden supporters burning down cities
mobs of Biden supporters burning down cities
…pursued by an army of birds in the rain
Or are the cities already on flame with rock n’ roll?
How does this fit in?
Number 1 of course. Nothing’s changed since the 60s.
Entire cities weren’t burned down then, either.
Salmon Rushdie just got ‘consequenced’ as your side loves to threaten and the consequencer wasn’t wearing a glorious MAGA hat.
He was attacked by a right wing, reactionary, nut job, but you are correct that the individual wasn’t wearing a red hat.
Or are the cities already on flame with rock n’ roll?
I don’t think – ipso facto – that can be it.
We built these cities …
[forget it. I can’t. I just … can’t]