That’s it-Pretend that people are laughing with you, not at you. Look how well that worked for Trump at his U.N. speech!
:rolleyes:
Speaking of Trump. Regardless of who’s laughing at him he’s still your president. And if Ginsburg gets ill 6/9 on the SC firmly on the right? Yeah, keep laughing, it’s really working.
Nicely done.
You have this belief that people would agree with you if only they understood what you were arguing. Since we don’t agree, therefore we must be too dumb, or to immersed in groupthink to understand.
This is the hallmark of the narcissistic, self-centered mind. Try considering some other possibilities for once.
Can’t really follow this.
Wrong. I don’t care about agreeing or disagreeing. Let’s say we are debating minimum wage. Let’s say you are for it and I’m against. We can disagree all we like. I don’t care. What I do care is when people say “oh you don’t like minimum wage therefore you hate the poor and are a bad person and everything you say is bad by association.”
Situation one is an honest disagreement which I have no problem with. I don’t even have a problem with disagreements if someone doesn’t quite understand what I’m saying. What I do have a problem with are with people who lie about what I’m saying, as a group, call me a troll, derail the thread, and then complain about me. As if I’m sitting in their chairs and typing their responses. That’s what I have a problem with.
I’ll pm you.
“Refute”? :smack: You’d best start by Googling “self-awareness.”
Blah blah blah. That’s it, keep repeating the same tired and patently untrue arguments. Maybe it’ll sink in for us one of these times!
Or again, consider the possibility that we understand you very well and are reacting to that.
Yeah, my response which contradicts your assertion is met with “blah blah blah.” You make an assertion I am a narcissist and can’t handle disagreement. I provide evidence that your assertion is wrong. You double down with more lies and “blah blah blah”? One of us is the jerk and one of us is making a good faith effort to communicate. Around here I know how people would vote. Thankfully, the only influence you have is around here.
Perhaps you could link to an actual thread where what you say happens, actually happens?
Where I am willing to disagree with people and not be bothered? How about this thread. I disagree with some people’s characterization of me. I am not calling them all too stupid or victims of group think.
The misogyny thread. I didn’t think people were stupid. I disagreed with implications of the proposal though. I can’t have a difference of opinion?
Remember, I am the supposed narcissist that cannot handle disagreement. Yet I post on a board where the majority of people hold views I disagree with and a vocal and organized trolling contingent are not only actively hostile they are very persistent and methodical. If I needed validation or I was approval seeking why would I engage where the environment is so stacked against me? :dubious:
Why do you feel you are owed a particular method of response when your posts are not only not true they are very condescending? And what does Trump have to do with any of this nonsense? Trump is living rent free in far too many of your heads.
Well, I understand what you are saying, and agree with some aspects of it. But the misogyny thread is a tough sell, one that you should just probably let go with “Well, I reviewed what I said, I guess it’s not really coming out right. My bad”
Totally in the running for “Most Pathetic Hijack Attempt of the Year”.
Yeah, you are right. I wouldn’t even be bothered if it was merely misread. I wouldn’t be bothered if I was asked for clarification or elaboration to flesh out my larger concerns. Especially in an environment in the real world where freedom of speech issues on social media platforms, college campuses, and the environment in general is under attack. By both sides to be honest. But I am bothered by personal attacks and lies. Weaponizing language and turning an accusation of racism or homophobia or sexism into the modern day equivalent of being a heretic or the US equivalent of being a blasphemer is something people who are worried abut freedom of expression and how powerful institutions can shut down communication need to be concerned with.
The SDMB is a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny subset of the world but some of the same principles apply. And it’s interesting to see that even in a place that prides itself, unjustifiably, on hosting forums that fight ignorance and engage in “great debates” is unable to fail to fall victim to the same emotionally charged mob justice mentality. It also doesn’t help that we have posters who actively push for more of that.
If I had a bit more prudence I would have stepped back and waited a bit to post. Let things cool down. But out of principle I don’t think we should be chilled from able to advocate a point of view or debate a nuance or an unintended consequence of a rule change just because it attracts people who have an agenda and are willing to take a warning or two, since there are several of them, in order to demonize people solely to discredit them and not the idea. The thing is, the mods who claim to want a place that has a ruleset scattered as it may be, have actually capitulated to the idea that a loud mob does indeed rule. It is a virtual Hecklers Veto.
Octo…we had a little talk last night about you learning your lesson. You cannot keep slapping at people and spouting indefensible points and expect to be accepted. You are welcome to have any opinion you want. Trying to convince others of your opinion is fraught with landmines. Can you maybe state your opinion and leave it there. You are bound to get push back. Your reputation as a fighter precedes you, so now it’s gonna be tough to shake the nay-sayers.
And, this; get over the other board shit you keep bringing up. Nothing can change that. Don’t read it if it bugs you.
The first 20 times you made the same argument, I was a little more respectful. By the time you’ve posted the exact same thing over and over and over, yeah, “blah blah blah” is all it’s worth.
Perhaps your inability to communicate with anything except the same repeated argument in every thread you enter is why you get the reaction you do.
Trump supporters are like people who just shit their pants. And are somehow proud of it.
They go around shouting, “You said I wouldn’t shit my pants! But I did! So I proved you wrong!”
Now from a distance, you can either have pity on somebody who sit their pants or you can laugh at somebody who shit their pants.
But when you have to ride in a car with somebody who shit their pants, it becomes unpleasant. You didn’t shit your pants but you have to deal with the smell of the shit in their pants.
And it gets annoying the way they keep yelling “Ha Ha! Look at you! I’m making you smell my shit! I win!”
When the same group of people ask the same stupid questions they are going to get the same answer. That’s not surprising.
Oh, come on! That wasn’t necessary.