OK Doper men, are there really two types of women?

[tdn]

@AHunter3

Would I actually have sex with them? I dunno, create for me with your magic wand the possibility of that happening

While you’re at it, do me too!

[alice_in_wonderland]

@FormerMarineGuy

At first glance, you would think she is the kind of girl you would take home to Mom for Thanksgiving, but after a little extra thought you realize that after having sex with her, you would not want to even have a two minute conversation with her. That is a girl made for fucking.

Why? I mean, why no conversation? She’s stupid? Evil? Her cooter has teeth?

[934spe]

@alice_in_wonderland

Why? I mean, why no conversation? She’s stupid? Evil? Her cooter has teeth?

Could be any of the three… From what I gather from my male friends, the most common traits of a woman you would fuck, but not marry are:

1. High Maintence. It is nice to play on the elite course, but you can’t afford a yearly membership.

2. Needy/Clingy. A phonecall is nice, unless it is every 5 minutes.

3. Hi Opal!

[alice_in_wonderland]

@Anaamika

Couldn’t this be said for women, too? Rodney Dangerfield said it best - “She dated Vinny for four years then married Irv; he’s a good provider”. Lots of women pull this.

Sure.

I guess I’m wondering why anyone would date Vinny for four years and then marry Irv, but from a guy’s perspective.

Personally, I’ve never dated anyone that I wanted to marry (even though a few of them wanted to marry me) but I think that has more to do with finding the idea of marriage pretty freaky in general.

However, I guess what I’m wondering about is the phenomena where, assuming someone was marriage minded, why they would date someone for an extended period of time if the person was never going to be “marriage material”.

[Count_Blucher]

I thought this thread was going to argue left-breast dominant vs right-breast dominant.
(ambi-breasterousness is a myth…)

[Anaamika]

@alice_in_wonderland

Sure.

I guess I’m wondering why anyone would date Vinny for four years and then marry Irv, but from a guy’s perspective.

Personally, I’ve never dated anyone that I wanted to marry (even though a few of them wanted to marry me) but I think that has more to do with finding the idea of marriage pretty freaky in general.

However, I guess what I’m wondering about is the phenomena where, assuming someone was marriage minded, why they would date someone for an extended period of time if the person was never going to be “marriage material”.

Fun times! Sex! Really wild things! And then you settle down with the person who is a bit staid and therefore will be forever faithful to you (presumably) and won’t ask for much and be a good mother (father) to your kids.

[alice_in_wonderland]

@Anaamika

Fun times! Sex! Really wild things! And then you settle down with the person who is a bit staid and therefore will be forever faithful to you (presumably) and won’t ask for much and be a good mother (father) to your kids.

Wow - this statement sent chills up my spine!

I can’t imagine deciding to spend my life with someone because he would be a “good father”.

yikes :eek:

[Bricker]

@alice_in_wonderland

1. The kind of woman men want to marry.
2. The kind of woman men want to fuck.

At this point in my life, #1 and #2 are identical sets containing exactly one woman.

But speaking in general, I agree that these two groups exist, but not that they are mutually exclusive. In other words, #1 can be a subset of #2. And there’s also a #3 set of “women I wouldn’t touch.”

[alice_in_wonderland]

@Count Blucher

(ambi-breasterousness is a myth…)

Nuh uh. I can totally get the tassles spinning in opposite directions…

[tdn]

@FormerMarineGuy

HOWEVER, there is always an exception. When I first met my wife, I told my friends “Yeah, I’m going to fuck her”. I ended up marrying her. So in the end, yes to 1, yes to 2, and yes to the damn free for all.

Sometimes a type 2 turns out to be a type 1 after all. The reverse is true a little more often. And it’s not always easy to see what type a woman is – it’s pretty blurry sometimes.

I should also mention that I don’t go around categorizing women in this way, pretty much ever. A woman may cross my mind as being either a type 2 or not. And even if she is, that doesn’t mean that I will persue her. I might just think “Yeah, I’d do her.” However, if there is mutual interest, I might then start to consider her as – well, maybe not a potential wife, but as someone that I’d date on a regular basis. So type 1 criteria come into play usually long before anything gets unzipped. And some of those criteria could be deal-breakers, even for a type 2 relationship.

[934spe]

@alice_in_wonderland

Nuh uh. I can totally get the tassles spinning in opposite directions…

You Tube video?.. :dubious:

[alice_in_wonderland]

@Bricker

And there’s also a #3 set of “women I wouldn’t touch.”

“I wouldn’t fuck her with my worst enemy’s dick?”

Heh. I’ve heard about those women…

[Khadaji]

Well there are indeed women I would have sex with and would not be willing to marry. I definitely would not marry a woman that I didn’t want to have sex with.

No, I guess I can’t say that I make the distinctions you have asked about.

[Anaamika]

@alice_in_wonderland

Wow - this statement sent chills up my spine!

I can’t imagine deciding to spend my life with someone because he would be a “good father”.

yikes :eek:

No, me neither, particularly since I’m not going to have kids! But I have met plenty of Indian girls like that. They sleep around and do whatever they want - then they go and have an arranged marriage with a nice boy from a good family. Then they pretend they’re all innocent and what-not. (I think we’re past the days of chicken blood, at least).

[alice_in_wonderland]

@934spe

You Tube video?.. :dubious:

Yes, but only for my closest friends…

[tdn]

@Bricker

And there’s also a #3 set of “women I wouldn’t touch.”

And this set is not composed entirely of skanky losers. Hey, your own mom might well be a type 3!

[Lemur866]

@alice_in_wonderland

However, I guess what I’m wondering about is the phenomena where, assuming someone was marriage minded, why they would date someone for an extended period of time if the person was never going to be “marriage material”.

Well, sex without love is an empty experience, but as empty experiences go, it’s one of the best. So when you find a woman who doesn’t throw up at the thought of having sex with you, you tend to want to keep having sex with her…even if she’s got defects that preclude marriage.

So the girl who drinks too much, or the girl who maxes out her credit cards, or the girl who believes in astrology, or the girl who disappears and reappears mysteriously every few months, or the girl who’s the wrong religion, or the girl with anger management issues. And the crazier and needier and bitchier a woman is, the more likely she is to be good in bed. But do you want to marry a needy crazy bitch?

[alice_in_wonderland]

@Lemur866

And the crazier and needier and bitchier a woman is, the more likely she is to be good in bed.

Wow, I must be a clingy psycho hose-beast!

[934spe]

@alice_in_wonderland

Yes, but only for my closest friends…

How does one get to be your friend?..

[tdn]

@Lemur866

And the crazier and needier and bitchier a woman is, the more likely she is to be good in bed.

Often true. But personally I find that after a while, it’s just not worth it. I have only so much patience for crazy.