Marriage isn’t something I’m looking for so women that I would consider an ongoing relationship with would have to be free of drama,histrionics, and the desire to get mairried and have children. Women I just want to fuck can be as dramatic and histrionic as they want, they just get to do it when I’m not fucking them. No, I don’t get much action.
No, it doesn’t work that way at least not among my circle of friends and acquaintances.
The categories are
-
Have a relationship with.
-
Have sex with.
-
Have neither.
See, now I would have thought a little bit of drama and histironics would actually enhance fucking…
Quickly twists his +20 ring of fidelity for protection
There’s good drama and bad drama. “Oh dear, I’m just a weak milk maid, and these buckets are too heavy, I hope the well-hung stable boy shows up to help me”, and “I saw you looking at another woman, so I’m going to cut you” are respective examples.
:eek: :eek: :eek:
Holy Christ on a Cracker! Now THAT’S some serious psycho hose-beast!!
That’s a whole different kind of drama and histrionics, the good kind. tdn has identified the bad kind.
For the record, I’ve never dated anyone who said that. I did, however, have a few sexual collisions with a woman who would disappear to jail or rehab for months at a time, then show up on my doorstep, very drunk, at 4am, with no coat and bare feet, in the middle of February. And then not remember how she ended up in my bed. And then later in the morning when I said I had to get to work, would go into a “rejection” rage, like I had a job just to piss her off.
That didn’t last long.
She seems pretty intelligent, but it is more along the lines of her personality. It seems a little, well, fucked up.
Alice in Wonderland:
But as I said, I don’t do marriage. Don’t believe in it. Consider it to be against my religion. Think the state should legally derecognize the instution. (I don’t do monogamy, possessiveness, and exclusivity in any form and certainly not as a legally enshrined thing).
So no relationship could ever “potentially lead to marriage”, or at least no more likely than it would “potentially lead to cannibalism”.
As your question is phrased, then, I guess my answer would be “No, there are only one types of women, the kind that are, uhhh, women…” --?
I thought my transliteration was pretty good, capturing what I assume “marriage” means to those who participate in it, etc, but it’s your question and your thread.
I would just like to make perfectly clear that if her cooter has teeth, she is most definitely not made for fucking. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Right. My question does sort of assume that the guys in question are in some way marriage minded.
If you’re never going to do it, then the question as to who you would potentially do it with is sort of moot. 
That’s AWESOME!
I think I dated her brother for a while…
I’m confused. Which category is OpalCat suppose to be in?
Like how? This is intriguing!
First, this woman is in her early forties, she is hot as shit, super sexy, beautiful body, light skinned, black hair, short, petite, with huge breasts and a nice ass (I am not a breast man but can’t help but stare). She is fair skinned, latin, and has the cutest freckles. She intrigues me, fascinates me, makes me wonder.
But here is how I picture her (and I really do consider myself a good judge of people, especially women, but I could be way off): I picture her having seven different colored dildos and/or vibrators in her nightstand, one for each day. I picture her as being wild, perhaps even a little bondage thrown in there. I picture the sex as being super wild, something to start a thread about, perhaps even deserving of a letter to Penthouse Forums. Listen, I have been with a lot of women, but this woman could probably teach me some things.
But here is how I picture after the deed is done: A tear or two, just because, wanting to tell you about her childhood, about her likes and dislikes, perhaps even a critique of the sex or a comparison of the past guys she has been with. She would ask you if you wanted to move in. She just seems nuts. She walks around sometimes in deep thought, and you can see she is dazed and perhaps confused.
Great to fuck, not marriage material. In retrospect, it would probably not be worth it, but it is nice to picture.
I think guys who have this opinion are the type of guys who think that it’s perfectly acceptible to cheat on your wife and that the role of wife is simply to bear children and maintain the household.
Probably a better way to put it is that of the set of women who you would fuck, there exists a subset that you would marry. Basically, depending on your priorities, you might marry a woman who isn’t as wild in the sac but is a sweet person who you get along with really well.
Wait - bondage is wild?
No, not wild, but for her, she walks around so ‘perfect’, the average guy would not expect it. She is quiet, but probably the exact opposite in the confounds of her comfort zone.
Wild, no, bondage, good.
You totally sound like Tarzan here. 