She doesn’t make that claim in the first article you linked to. Got another? In fact, she’s kind of implying the opposite.
OK, apparently I wasn’t clear the first time, so let me break it down. First, you pit Palin.
Then, when it was pointed out to you that Palin didn’t actually say what you said she said, you acknowledged this possibility but added that it was sexism that pissed you off.
So, it would seem the original pitting was pretty much dead at that point. But then you turned it back on Palin.
So do I have a problem with it? No, not like I’m going to lie awake worrying about it. I just don’t get why your anger at sexist articles leads you to pit the subject of sexist articles, unless you just really want to pit Palin and don’t care what the reason is.