Inmates are released early all the time, most often simply because of overcrowding. In these cases, the sentencing judge does not send them back to jail. Why should Paris Hilton be treated any differently? Just because she is rich and was on TV doesn’t mean that she should spend anymore time in jail than anyone of us peons would, does it?
Only if the specific sentence handed down by the judge says “no house arrest,” “no electronic monitoring devices” (or something to that effect), which you mention.
Other than that, I’ve never heard of a judge getting involved in early releases in such *relatively * offenses or re-imposing a longer sentence because the gaolkeeper let someone out.
Whether she hungry or it was her herpes flaring up, I’m sure whatever “medical reason” she had could have been handled adequately at a correctional facility. Mine would be, and so would yours.
That’s my big objection in all this. Your ass (or mine) would still be sharing a cell with Jimbo “Stabby” McCorkle, and nobody would think twice about it no matter how much we didn’t like it. If you didn’t eat, you’d get a tube. If you were depressed, you might get to see a pro bono shrink twice a month.
But she’s special, and now she gets to suffer. Oh. Fucking. Wah.
Ya gotta remember, she was in jail on a misdemeanor. Given the option of keeping Paris Hilton in jail or moving her out to make room for Thursday nights usual crowd of violent assulters, the sheriff probably made the correct decision.
I think the main issue here are that due process wasn’t followed. The sheriff released her without filing, and released her in direct contravention of the judges order.
Yes, some inmates are released due to overcrowded, but I’ve never heard of a regular person being released because of some mystery ‘medical issue’. She did the crime, she can do the time. I hope it’s a lesson to all the Paris’ and Lohan’s out there.
No sympathy here for her. I find the whole thing incredible amusing actually. This is probably the first time in her entire life she didn’t get her way. I’m sure that would make her cry.
The really funny part to me is that I dont remember her crying this much(at least in public)when a freakin porn tape of her all fucked up, blowing some guy, showed up all over the place! but put her in jail, under heavy security (shes in no danger from anyone im sure), for 45 days and her world is over. I mean hell, in those 45 days she will earn more in interest on her money then most people will in the next 10yrs. Cry me a friggin river.
She was staying in a special section of an all-female jail in Lynnwood that’s reserved for police officers, public officials, celebrities, and other high-profile inmates. Space was likely not an issue.
I’m not Paris Hilton or anything, but I’d be a WHOLE lot more torn up over going to jail than a sex tape. A sex tape leaking would be disconcerting and certainly not the ideal thing, so I’d be upset, but being in jail would tear me apart.
I don’t even see how the two situations are comparable.
Again, she had a private cell in an all-female prison reserved for celebrities and high-profile criminals. She was hardly staying in “Oz”. The worst thing about it would be the boredom.
The whole point of this exercise has been for Paris to take some degree of responsibility for her actions. The shame is, after all her sleazeball escapades she had a chance to earn back an ounce of public respect by lifting her chin up and serving her sentence like the 26 year old adult that she supposedly is. But instead, she continues to try and slither out of it by any means possible. Crying for her Mommy in court? A petition to the governer to commute your DUI sentence? It’s embarrassingly pathetic and disgraceful.
Somehow, seeing the words ‘leaking’, ‘sex tape’ and ‘Paris Hilton’ together make me throw up a little in my mouth. In my opinion, she acted in, directed and produced that video for purposes of distribution.
Yeah, you got me there and someone else pointed out that she wasn’t released, she was under house arrest with an ankle braclet. Nonetheless, she did what was asked of her and was subsequently sent home. She didn’t escape, she didn’t jump bail, she didn’t ‘shank’ anyone in the shower. If the judge wants to send someone back to jail, let him send the sheriff.
I don’t get that. If a person has been sentenced and then improperly released, it doesn’t render the sentence null and void. It isn’t No Harm No Foul that they got released early due to improper procedures. They should still fulfill that sentence.
For instance, if a sheriff accidentally released a Death Row inmate — let’s say it was Scott Peterson — then do you just say, “Oh darn, I guess we can’t execute him now. BAD sheriff! We’ll execute you instead and let the murderer go free.”
No, we don’t. The prisoner serves the term for which he was sentenced. Any action brought against the sheriff for improper procedure is a separate offense.
I just know somebody is going to jump on my case for comparing Paris Hilton’s sentence to a murder case, but the point is, if that’s the proper solution when a prisoner is improperly released, it should apply uniformly no matter what the sentence or who the offender.
I was gonna respond for another round because there is a difference between keeping a murderer behind bars and keeping a housefly like Paris Hilton behind bars and sometimes I just like arguing for the sake of arguing, but I’m all done now. Even arguing for the sake of arguing loses some of it’s appeal when Paris Hilton is involved.
No, but it is definitely starting to appear that her family leaned on the sheriff’s office to get her out of there ASAP. The sheriff holds an elected office and the Hilton family is one of his biggest donators. And from day one the sheriff’s office has been curiously bending over backwards to make Paris’ stay a trip to Disneyland. "I’ll tell you what Paris, if you check in right before midnight and check out right after midnight, we’ll just go ahead and count those as full extra days towards your sentence for you, Ok? "
And the Sheriff’s dept was supposed to provide the report on her mysterious “medical situation” (aka: IDontLikeBeingInJailitis) to the judge before her house arrest release which was explicitely forbidden in her sentence. But the report wasn’t provided, and they still hadn’t provided it at her hearing this morning. That’s why the judge got steamed and rightly called shenanagins on the whole affair and now Paris is back in jail and the Sheriff may be facing a corruption investigation. That’s why Paris is so upset. Because it was just today, that things stopped going according to plan.
I’ve not an ounce of sympathy for her. I’m glad she has to serve the full 45 days. She deserves a longer sentence. I do wonder if the sheriff gets to keep the bribe, though.
I have to wonder, too, about what’s going on behind the scenes. Clearly, the sheriff is in the Hilton camp. Just the reduction in her sentence was probably the result of another “campaign contribution.” The judge may be trying to circumvent the sheriff’s misdeeds rather than just being mean. Who knows? Maybe the judge would by now like to go after the sheriff for something but can’t because of some arcane political maneuverings.