Can somebody explain couture to me? What does it mean? What is it trying to do?
Jeffrey won with something that looked like a cut up tablecloth randomly stitched together, with a contrasting napkin or two sewn in where there were gaps. The two halves of the skirt were split up to the model’s cooter, which because of fortunate wind patterns on the runway didn’t actually come out and wave to the judges. I was waiting for my favorite judge-word, “vulgar”, which seems to come out with little relation to the garment’s potential for the public display of naughty-bits.
Admittedly it was the boldest choice out there, though it was probably a risk he could take because he had immunity. I could see how it was like some of the “WTF” garments you see in the clips from the Paris shows, rather than the rest which seemed to be (at least attempted) wearable dresses. But could someone please explain to me the criteria by which it won the show? I thought that the comments would be that it was a thrown-together mess, but Jeffrey, you survive because you have immunity (or because Vincent’s thing was uber-blah).
I thought Uli (or Ulricke, as Heidi more formally called her countrywoman) had the most beautiful dress, but it was just another Uli-dress, stepped up a notch. I didn’t see the creativity in it.
I liked Kayne’s dress. Yes it was a bit over the top as usual, but that was better than the under-doneness of most of his competitors, and for all of the detailing it appeared to be well constructed within the short time frame allowed. Rubystreak asked why Kayne doesn’t take Tim’s good advice. I think it is because Tim saunters in 3/4 of the way through the competition, looks at Kayne’s work, says “I hate it” and doesn’t seem to give him constructive suggestions that can be implemented within the time available. With the others (at least as edited for TV), it seems he often gives specific ideas for particular fixable points. With Kayne, it seems to be just a generalized hatred of the his overall idea, which in the end always seems to turn out to be very well-executed.
Michael was, for a change, overly ambitious, and he left himself short on time, though you could see that dress would have been beautiful given enough time. The bunny ears were awful, but I was impressed at how after he tucked them in, the dress looked like something you would see on a top actress at the Oscars. I loved the comments about how it looked like what the designers got back from the celebrities after the events. And what was up with the egg-throwing?
Then we have Laura. I think it was unfortunate that in New York she had a dark-skinned flat-chested model, because it really emphasized that her dress was just a disembodied collar flapping its way down the runway. Once more we have a one-note designer doing her one-note thing. The dress showed me nothing, and the collar just made me ask “why?”. And shut up with the bitchy comments–you are just not all that yourself. She could have gotten the axe, but for Vincent.
Ah, Vincent. Before we get to the dress, let me say that he should have been immediately pitched overboard for gushing like that to the French designer. And we really don’t need to say much about the dress, because it speaks (or rather simpers and whines) for itself. Though I like Vincent personally, much more than Laura, who I hate, and Uli who is just a cold fish, the dress made the choice easy this week.