Tweet I’ve seen reposted as a meme:
Please say a prayer for my friend America’s Mayor Rudy Giulani.
I’d unplug Rudy to charge my phone.
Tweet I’ve seen reposted as a meme:
Please say a prayer for my friend America’s Mayor Rudy Giulani.
I’d unplug Rudy to charge my phone.
The specific incident I remember was an interview with someone, with the phrasing “under Bush” rather than “before Obama”, but he probably told it multiple times.
IANAL, but AIUI, that’s not quite true. The estate doesn’t become the heirs’ property until after probate. Probate is when the deceased’s legally incurred debts get paid off, as much as possible.
At that point, the party who owes the money is of course not the deceased, who can’t owe anything anymore, and not the heirs, but the estate itself.
Sorry, but “Property that owns itself” is a tad to abstract for me.
Everything worked out pretty well when my mom passed. But it took weeks to sort out, and she was very good at keeping records.
I just moved into her home for a while, before selling it.
can we change the title of this thread to “Rudy is dying”?
Or is that bad luck, like the other thread, where the subject utterly refuses to comply with the thread title?
Heh, wait till you find out about the legal personhood of corporations! ![]()
Sorry, but AFAICT, there’s really no legally valid way to think about a decedent’s estate as being “owned” by a person until probate is completed. It is not owned by the decedent, who is dead and can’t own anything; it is not owned by the heirs, who have no legal claim on any of it until and unless probate determines that there are leftover assets after payment of just debts.
If you like, I guess you can think of the estate as being jointly owned by the creditors and the heirs, who are in the process of figuring out who gets what part(s) of it, if any. But I’m not sure a lawyer would agree with you.
Probate is basically legal limbo, or a state of indeterminacy. You have to wait for the waveform to collapse to know who owns what.
I believe that’s what happened with Schrödinger’s estate…
Did it turn out that he left everything to the cat?
Everything and nothing at the same time. Until the lawyer finally read off the will.
That’s a great answer. The estate is formally a ward of the court. The court controls everything about who can see it, influence it, and change it.
In effect it is also a corporation or more precisely a form of trust. A non-living entity with potentially infinite life span. which entity has some specific named humans empowered to act on its behalf and thereby animate the zombie.
As the decedent dies, both their assets and their liabilities instantly transmute into the estate. And eventually, when the human court administrative process takes over, some specific human, the executor or personal representative or whatever they call it in any given jurisdiction, is empowered to grasp the controls of the estate and execute the legally mandated processes of creditor notification, creditor payment, and eventual asset distribution. Oh yeah, and tax-paying. Can’t forget taxes. Which are not only inevitable in life, but also early into death.
In my 23 years of practice I never heard any standard definitions for the various conditions. The one real exception: in a practical sense, “critical” usually just means they’re in the ICU. That’s because unless you list their condition as critical it’s hard to get the insurer to pay for the ICU bed. Otherwise conditions pretty meaningless and we don’t think about them unless there’s some sort of news release.
“Critical but stable” makes perfect sense to me–he’s in the ICU on a ventilator but he’s tolerating it well, his vitals are stable, and he’s not requiring any pressors to keep his BP up. Bad off, not out of the woods, still worth watching in the unit, but headed in the right direction.
Critical is a natural 20, of course.
Or a natural 1, critical fails are critical too…
Is he dead yet? I really need to take a leak and his grave seems like a great place to do it.
I hate to ask, as my stomach turns… is that a hickey on Trump’s neck? Just behind and below his ear? I mean, I am all for adult fun, but is Melania?
It’s fun to think yes but almost assuredly no. It’s probably a rash, caused by whatever serious medical conditions his handlers are very carefully hiding from the public.
I just want to mention that this thread has a really funny title right now.
Yeah; I went to the “Misinterpreted Thread Title” thread to post it, but somebody beat me to it.