we see that on a woldwide scale, really … and that is something new (nr. 45 being def. a sad trailblazer here) … where you can pretty openly lie nowadays as a politician without mayor repercussions
I think it also has to do with social media, like twitter — where you get your $hit out and posted, and once those pesky factcheckers come in, the whole show has already moved on …and you get read by 1000s and the checkers by 100s … so there is the whole information-economy working in your favour.
That’s an interesting article. I’m surprised that they are giving away so much information including the overall strategy. Is it because it’s obvious or there is a tactical reason to do it or…?
I think the UN and IAEA needs more on.site observers. It may be the only way to deter shelling. Zaporizhzhia has to be one of the most urgent priorities for the IAEA.
Guardian blog
Multiple possibilities, but we can obviously conclude that the Ukrainians think it advantageous to release the information. Maybe they think there’s nothing the Russians can do about the logistical situation, so announcing it is worth it for the morale gains. Maybe they think the information will leak to the Russian forces and will further diminish their will to fight. Maybe the information isn’t actually true, and is being released as propaganda.
Just because the Ukrainians are the good guys in this conflict doesn’t mean that their propaganda is all true.
I would expect it to be better (low bar, granted). Russia is driven by oligarch-led corruption, where everyone is trying to get rich.
North Korea is driven by loyalty to/fear of the Dear Leader (or whatever adjective the current guy uses) and possibly a belief that the West is chomping at the bit to invade. Artillery is apparently what they depend on, so while I wouldn’t expect great quality, the calculus is more like “money for me or buy a tank” in Russia and “make an artillery shell that goes boom as expected or get strapped to a gun to test the next one that comes off my line” in North Korea.
They’re not releasing anything the Russians don’t already know. If supplies aren’t getting through then the lowest soldier on the ladder knows it.
If they can’t get supplies moved on the ground that means air drops and that isn’t going to work well for them. Ukrainian special ops teams with stinger missiles are probably already well hidden in anticipation.
There’s also the straight propaganda value for releasing information that the Russian soldiers on the wrong side of the river would read on-line. They can see the Ukrainians announcing that the noose is tightening on them, and their own army can’t help them.
Russian supplies are being moved over the Dneiper River using barge ferries ever since HIMARS attacks damaged the bridges. The bridges were damaged badly enough that they can’t be used by trucks or any vehicle bigger than a motorcycle. I heard a report on DW this morning where they estimated Russian forces are receiving about 30% of the fuel, ammo, and food supplies they received prior to the bridges getting taken out. Naturally the need for more supplies has increased considerably since the Ukrainian counter-offensive began to cause Russians to USE those supplies more rapidly.
I suspect the Russians would sooner withdraw their troops across the river from Kherson than lose any more of their 30 million dollar aircraft doing airdrops.