SDMB Bigoted Asshole Omnibus Thread

[Gyrate]

@MrDibble

I’m a credit to my race.

It must be the tiny amount of Oriental genes I have.

I don’t think we can address this properly until we know how large your penis is.

[Steve_MB]

@cards

My god man, it’s a miracle you can even post! You must be a hell of an outlier.

It’s those finely honed survival skills that allow people to exist in a society with an average IQ of 54.

[MrDibble]

@Paranoid_Randroid

So, I’ve always wondered, does human flesh really taste like chicken?

Naah, Pork.

Or is that an urban myth? Do you cook it in a sauce or use a dry rub or something?

Everyone knows we use a cauldron.

[Truman_Burbank]

Mr. Dibble is a credit to his race, I’m sure.
Of course, he also needs water wings to swim and will never be able to manage a baseball team…
And I love the “Tiny Band” analolgy…

[Steve_MB]

@MrDibble

Naah, Pork.Everyone knows we use a cauldron.

And believe you me, it’s a bitch to make a cauldron out of stone, especially when your people are handicapped by a severe case of teh stoopids.

[Truman_Burbank]

Which still begs the question of who is helping Dibble to type? I’d jump to the conclusion that it’s a woman, but we know women are also inferior.
We also know my tribe can’t jump, even to conclusions…

[Great_Antibob]

@Bryan_Ekers

I was considering entering the thread with something very similar to this, so I’ll just wait to see what response it generates, if any.

Based on any of NDDs (and, to a lesser extent B84) previous responses to similar questions, I’m confident it will be something that provides no actual evidence and simply asserts that it’s been proven that DNA analysis can separate people into these races, that it’s obvious (which is, in their minds, the key point somehow), and put it on everybody else to prove otherwise (despite the literally hundreds of times that’s already been done).

Oh, and bonus points if you can get NDD to reference a Crappy Pseudo-Science Book that’s obviously a good source because it’s totally underlined and italicized.

[BrainGlutton]

@New_Deal_Democrat

Cannibalism has occasionally happened during the twentieth century outside of Africa as a response to starvation. It is far more prevalent in Africa as my post demonstrated.

The Master Speaks.

September 23, 1988

*Dear Cecil:

I was just reading about those boat people in Southeast Asia who had to resort to cannibalism to survive and it reminded me of something I heard once. Is it true that cannibalism was outlawed because people developed laughing sickness afterward and died by literally busting a gut?

— Listener, Dick Whittington show, KIEV radio, Los Angeles*

Cecil replies:

Let’s take this step-by-step. Number one, forget about laughing sickness. It’s possible to die laughing, a topic I have addressed in the past, but that’s not the disease you allegedly get from people eating. Most likely you’re thinking of kuru, a fatal neurological ailment characterized by trembling. From 1957 to 1977 kuru was epidemic among certain New Guinea tribes and was suspected of being contracted by eating human flesh. But cannibalism had been outlawed long before.

The question you should have asked, if you don’t mind my saying so, is whether cannibalism (or anthropophagy, as we intellectual snobs like to call it) occurs on a systematic basis at all. In a 1979 book called The Man-Eating Myth, anthropologist William Arens argues that cannibalism is the equivalent of an urban legend: lots of researchers say they’ve heard about it, but hardly anybody has actually seen it happen.

Arens does not deny the occurrence of cannibalism in survival situations, as with the boat people or those guys whose plane crashed in the Andes in 1972. But he says there is no proof it has ever taken place anywhere routinely. Most accounts by early explorers are so larded with patent nonsense that no credence can be placed in them. Reports by contemporary anthropologists, which rely heavily on hearsay, aren’t much better.

What is common, Arens believes, is not cannibalism but belief in cannibalism, spurred by the mixture of horror and fascination man eating has always inspired. Many cultures have built up a considerable mythology around cannibalism — consider the Christian notion of consuming the body and blood of Christ. Explorers and anthropologists heard non-Western versions of such legends and made the mistake of taking them literally.

In some cases, I should point out, the mistake was no accident. Stories about cannibalism in the Caribbean spread in part because Spanish kings allowed only cannibal tribes to be enslaved. Naturally this inspired the conquistadors to declare just about every inhabitant of the New World guilty.

Cannibalism stories arise for a variety of reasons. A people may accuse its enemies of cannibalism (and often incest) to demonstrate its superiority: we’re civilized, they’re savages. One recalls accusations that Jews drank the blood of Christians; many Africans today believe Europeans drink blood. A tribe may confess to having practiced cannibalism in the indefinite past as a way of saying, look how far we’ve come. In the African equivalent of witchcraft trials, a few unlucky souls might confess to cannibalism under torture just as women here and in Europe confessed to sorcery.

Even prehistoric cannibalism cannot be regarded as a sure thing. A number of archaeologists have reported finding human bones showing the cut marks and breakage characteristic of food refuse, but these may represent isolated instances of survival cannibalism. There is little evidence to suggest that man eating was customary in the Stone Age.

In the scientific community reaction to Arens’s book has been sharply divided. A few people liken him to the nuts who claim the mass slaughter of Jews and others during World War II never happened. But the more common view is that while routine cannibalism may not be entirely unknown, its frequency has probably been greatly exaggerated. Many now believe, for instance, that New Guinea natives are not cannibals and that kuru is spread by contact with corpses during funeral preparations, although there is still some argument about this. Cannibalism may yet join witchcraft on the dustheap of history.

— Cecil Adams

[Paranoid_Randroid]

I find it telling, the hostility with which you people react to the idea that those of the Negro race may, on average, be sex-crazed criminals with mental retardation. Where’s the spirit of open, honest, civil debate? Okay, true, NDD engages in the sort of magical thinking that posits specific genes that control IQ, and Brazil84 prefers to tear down “pure environmentalist” strawmen rather than address the the arguments presented to him. And, yeah, the IQ differential between “races” has tended to rise and fall over relatively short periods of time, putting the lie to the fact that the magnitude of that differential is due entirely to genetics.

What was I saying? Oh, yeah, you guys are being too hard on them. It’s not their fault they come from a race (in my new taxonomic classification system!) subject to pressures that selected for gullibility and imperviousness to contrary ideas. Sadly, they lack the coal skin of the Negroes so we cannot identify them on sight …

@Great_Antibob

Oh, and bonus points if you can get NDD to reference a Crappy Pseudo-Science Book that’s obviously a good source because it’s totally underlined and italicized.

And don’t forget: if that book has any flaws, say in the sources of data which underly its most forceful conclusions, we should overlook them because the authors were doing the very best they could.

[Truman_Burbank]

Sadly, I suspect NDD and Brazil are also maxing out their potential…

[cmyk]

@Bryan_Ekers

I was considering entering the thread with something very similar to this, so I’ll just wait to see what response it generates, if any.

It won’t because I’m on b84’s “ignore” list: a list he puts you on if you’ve proven adequate enough to punch real holes in his world view, so that he can use his astoundingly veiled excuse that he has rules for not debating with liars or some shit.

Also, if b84 and NDD wouldn’t mind, let’s cut this “anti-racist” PC bullshit, and call us what I’d prefer: “racist haters.”

You do that, and we’ll cut out the bullshit PC term “racist realists” and just call you “racists” instead.

[cmyk]

Yay! We win!

Load up the rail gun, and let’s fire these racist bastards into the sun…

[Bryan_Ekers]

@cmyk

It won’t because I’m on b84’s “ignore” list

Well, in that case I’ll just shamelessly steal your post and present it as my own:

brazil84:

Let’s gently take your definitions and repackage them back over to you; keeping it on an honest mark with the assertion of this thread and the OP; no obfuscation:

Race 1) {Negroes}

Race 2) {Orientals}

Race 3) {Caucasians}

We’ll start with just two simple, and honest questions:

1. Genetically, how should we define each of the races you insist exist? That is, by what genetic criteria is each to fall under, at the minimum?

2. Failing genetics, how is someone like myself supposed to determine, with accuracy, which race some individual should fall under?

[Evil_Economist]

I’m only reading this thread as an excuse to avoid doing something else that I really need to do, but felt the need to post kudos to Heart of Dorkness for his/her excellent post. I came into this thread not sure what the state-of-the-art was on race and intelligence, but then I read your post, and am leaving the wiser for it (unlike some others I could name). You probably have a future in writing or teaching.

For fun, let’s get Brazil84 and NDD in a thread with that “problems with relativity” guy, and let them throw incoherent stupidities at each other, far away from those of us who are capable of learning.

[cmyk]

On a board dedicated to fighting ignorance, it’d be nice for the Pit to have a sub-forum: The 9th Ring of Ignorance, where those that are impermeably ignorant can continue to spout off about their pet ideologies, anti-science manifestos and conspiracy theories; also where the rest of the board, who might be interested, can poke them with scalpels and electrodes to see what kind of response we get, instead of simply banning them, dismissing them, or clogging up the other forums.

You know, for the sake of human interest and posterity.

[Truman_Burbank]

Isn’t that how the Freepers’ Board got started?

[Bryan_Ekers]

It’s certainly how the “Stupid Republican Idea of the Day” thread got started.

[Ramira]

I do not see a reason why this is connected with Left or Right politics, it is a matter of science and I am not happy to see it made political for no reason.

[Ramira]

@Bryan_Ekers

Well, in that case I’ll just shamelessly steal your post and present it as my own:

brazil84:

Let’s gently take your definitions and repackage them back over to you; keeping it on an honest mark with the assertion of this thread and the OP; no obfuscation:

Race 1) {Negroes}

Race 2) {Orientals}

Race 3) {Caucasians}

We’ll start with just two simple, and honest questions:

1. Genetically, how should we define each of the races you insist exist? That is, by what genetic criteria is each to fall under, at the minimum?

2. Failing genetics, how is someone like myself supposed to determine, with accuracy, which race some individual should fall under?

**
84** will not answer except in restating questions.

[gamerunknown]

@Great Antibob

Oh, and bonus points if you can get NDD to reference a Crappy Pseudo-Science Book that’s obviously a good source because it’s totally underlined and italicized.

Not to mention, the great challenges and obstacles racist authors have in being accepted in academic circles! Perhaps the federal government should intervene to prevent this sickening prejudice from preventing them from selling thousands of books and working for conservative think-tanks?

@Mijin

just try to make the playing field as fair as possible (i.e. no AA)

Historical privilege is conveyed through inheritance. AA is pretty much the non-Marxist solution to the fact that the playing field was built on a hill. Tim Wise speaks very compellingly about the history of white privilege.

@Ibn Warraq

doesn’t that suggest that your theories of whites being “mentally superior” is bullshit?

Alas, while these prickly accusations are in jest, I’m forced to point out they’re an example of faulty generalisation. Afterall, you could just be an anomaly (StormFronters refer to Thomas Sowell as a member of club 13% or 17% - in their parlance, the proportion of blacks more intelligent than the average white). There, that’s my fairness and balance done for the day.

@brazil84

provided a precise set of criteria to support the claim that blacks “don’t exist” or “don’t exist as a genetic group”

They don’t need to. Burden of proof isn’t on the individual denying the claim, it’s on the individual making it: empirical evidence, theoretical framework.

@brazil84

Why do you think people in this very thread talk about economic embargos on Haiti?

You introduced Haiti here, in an ignorant attempt to come up with an example of a country with an attainment gap without US interference. Several African countries would have been better candidates because other empires had been fucking them over historically. I don’t expect you to buy historical mistreatment of indigenous populations as a dispositional explanation for an achievement gap, or else you’d be out on the streets marching with the New Black Panther Party and demanding reparations. However, I think it is disingenuous to refer to it as an example of a “Liberal Excuse” when introducing US’ historical role in keeping down darkie was merely rectifying your ignorance. Unfortunately, instead of humbly accepting that fact, you pounced on it, put it in a box and trailed that box in front of us, promising us that we’d have a delicious red herring if we’d only accept that we were bleeding heart liberals overly concerned with historical iniquity.