Since this train wreck is still going, I’ll respond to this bit of strange fruit here
You really are a sick piece of shit.
Yeah I thought that was really gross. He doesn’t come across as joking at all and he’s talking about hanging black people (because only blacks are criminals doncha know).
The purpose of the criminal justice system should be to get criminals off the street, keep them off, and prevent them from spreading their crime genes. The emphasis should be on the frequent use of capital punishment, and on long prison sentences at hard labor, enforced by the whip.
Criminals are worthless, useless, and dangerous. Society would be better off if they never had been born. They should be treated with the most exquisite cruelty.
Civilization breeds civilized people because the criminal justice system of a civilized country removes those with criminal inclinations from the gene pool.
You really *are *a time traveller from the 1820s, aren’t you ?
Crime… Genes…???
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
You truly are a complete fucking moron.
No. More likely he’s just a pathetic basement-dweller who can’t handle that society doesn’t think he’s as “special” as he thought he was.
You’ll notice how he loves quoting Rushton and trumpeted Rushton as a great scientist until it was pointed out that Rushton thinks white men have really small penises which caused him to suddenly argue that Rushton ideas on that shouldn’t be trusted and then he hurriedly typed out a post insisting that “heterosexual women” didn’t really care about how small a man’s penis was.
The whole thing was quite revealing.
That’s priceless. Can you say that with a Russian accent?
Rushton has said, “You can have a large penis, or a large brain. You can’t have both.” He says that large penises correlate with having illegitimate children, while large brains correlate with superior intelligence.
You are a fool who cannot discuss a controversial topic without responding like a vulgar thug.
It is reported in the scientific literature that there are some genes which are responsible for aggression in living beings. Moreover, some mutations into some of the normal genes make an individual more aggressive and s/he has and increased tendency to commit a crime.
The entire human genome has been sequenced almost a decade ago but it represents a “normal” human. With the lowering cost of the technology to sequence, we can undertake the project to sequence the genomes of, for example, serial killers or other hardened criminals. Once we have sufficient number of genomes sequenced, we will have some meaningful data to play with…
Eugenics practice to threaten the lives of individuals with certain genetic makeup is another issue needed to be considered. But for the benefit of the affected individuals; the accused, the victim and the society in general, it must be utilized to its fullest. After all, the safety of the society is more important than the privacy of a few individuals.
The writer is a PhD Research Scholar at Forensic DNA Lab, Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology Lahore.
http://www.technologytimes.pk/2011/08/14/criminal-genes-and-the-human-genome/
Turns out you can also have neither.
And the writer NDD is abusing now does not agree with anyone using that research as justification to discriminate a group of people.
I have seen that so many times that it is clear to me that there are no easy pickings for trash talkers like NDD.
I already did check what people like the writer of “The Bell Curve” is doing nowadays, Charles Murray is not respected where it counts (being published is not the same as being respected) as even the Colbert Report showed, and he is a a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, now why is that so familiar?
Ah yes:
Birds of a feather in the anti-science front, no wonder AEI are also supporting a fellow “elitism is genetic” and fuck the poor, that has continued to fail at convincing real scientists that he has the truth.
Nah, he is just ending like Jeremy crying in his shrinking circle that only contains science denialism.
-Yellow Submarine
This is the fucking Pit, you fucking moron. It’s not for fucking debating, it’s for calling fucking morons the fucking names they fucking deserve. If you fucking want a debate, go do it in Great Debates (where you’ve also been demolished).
Murray has published opinion pieces in The New Republic, Commentary, The Public Interest, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, National Review, and the Washington Post.[23] He has been a witness before United States congressional and senate committees and a consultant to senior Republican government officials in the United States, and conservative officials in the United Kingdom, Eastern Europe, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).[23]
I have been flamed, but not refuted.
I can’t believe this thread is still going.
Yes, and they are no doubt associated with the low, sloping forehead and close-set eyes of the criminal physiognomy, not to mention certain highly-telling phrenological bumps first detected in the Common Gypsy.
Some people are born criminals. You can tell from their faces.
As time goes on scientific efforts to detect criminal inclinations will become more precise.
And I know that already Jeremy. The point of the nowhere man is that the circles become smaller as time goes by and ending as a fellow of a denier stink thank is a **demonstration **of that.
Just be happy in your shrinking circle Mr. Boo.
I’d put more faith in the imminent dawn of the pre-cogs, if I were you. And those will just make your brain hurt.