Actually what I heard was that Adolf Hitler banned IQ testing for being “Jewish”. So can you give us a big fat cite for Hitler’s test?
Because you assert it doesn’t make it true.
This is becoming all too easy.
Would a vote legitimize it for you?
If this were a spelling bee, you would have been ejected.
My point, for those like b84 and NDD, that can’t actually comprehend the implications of a statement is this:
A person is more than their intelligence. They are a holistic culmination (i.e. the whole is greater than the sum if their parts) of everything from what’s encoded in their DNA, to everything that surrounds them; from the abstract to the physical.
Hitler’s ostensibly high IQ didn’t do humanity any good, when his philosophy was so far off. IQ scores just cannot determine the merits and integrity of a human’s worth to the rest of society. Demonstrably so.
If you argue different, you’re a willfully ignorant, biased, moron.
IQ does not measure moral superiority. It does measure biological superiority. If he was less intelligent Hitler would have been less successful.
You will find it nearly as difficult to find any of my misspelled words as any of my flame attacks.
Probably almost any country in the world has had violence, invasions, pillaging, bloody revolutions, civil wars, occupations, etc. over the last few hundred years. So there is plenty of fodder for the Liberal Excuse Machine.
Excuses are not needed for whites and Orientals. They are certainly not needed for Jews. They are needed for blacks. Somehow the Liberal Excuse Machine needs to keep coming up with arguments that it is our fault that most blacks are stupid, and that many are dangerous. Because this is difficult, they try to make it dangerous to tell the truth about that race.
Bobby who?
I’m not sure what you mean by “all together different thing.”
But anyway, a few posts back I stated the following::
Note that I did not use the phrase “all together” – whatever it means to you.
Now, you claim that my post is a lie. And yet earlier in this thread I specifically asked you whether “you believe that intelligence is somehow different from other genetically informed traits”
You responded by describing various aspects of intelligence. Any reasonable person reading your response would interpret it to mean that you were describing aspects of intelligence which were different (in your view) from other genetically informed traits.
I have my own rules of debate. I don’t engage with people who weasel, i.e. people who pretend that they said something different from what they actually said.
I also don’t engage with people who strawman, i.e. people who pretend that I said something different from what I actually said.
You have done both, so I am putting you on my ignore list.
Goodbye, liar.
Iq does not measure biological superiority,
http://www.minddisorders.com/Flu-Inv/Intelligence-tests.html
Of course not. But the fact that you put so much stock in argumentum ad populum is telling.
Such a calm debater :rolleyes:, I still have to see on what rules of debating would allow someone to ignore others and then claim that only they are the ones that have the podium and the truth.
This is possibly the funniest thing i have ever read on these boards.
You provide a bunch of estimates of famous people’s IQs as some sort of evidence for your argument, and then you provide an estimate of Thomas Jefferson’s IQ but argue, based on your own insights, that it was actually higher.
What criteria did you use to establish that your wild-ass guess is better than the other person’s wild-ass guess?
Says the one that also made a post in GQ trying to find if a whoosh was supposed to be something of value, in the end the brazil nut also “banned” the one that made that whoosh to him. The gross lack of a sense of humor demonstrates his lack of an important element of a sound intelligence.
i.e. I can’t debate with this poster because he exposes my dishonesty and ignorance.
And according to your own rules of debate, you should put yourself on your own ignore list. Fucking idiot.
ETA: you’re doing me a favor more than yourself. And I know you can read this, because you’re a liar.
He’s made his rules clear. They all boil down to “it’s against the rules to disprove what I say!”
Welcome to the club cmyk! You get a seat aboard the Yellow Submarine that will take us somewhere, while the nowhere men will continue to avoid their reviews.
Brings me back to my question: what are your qualifications to make an estimate? How much schooling do you have, and what do you know about IQ testing? You’ve dodged and ignored this one the whole length of 2 threads…