Yes, well, fiction is called fiction for a reason: it’s fictional. And “getting the girl” by “doing the right things” is still entirely the wrong way of looking at it: try to do right, both to yourself and to others, not because that’s a Konami code that will unlock a vagina, but because people who try to do right are more attractive than those who don’t, or won’t.
Oh, I’m not saying that these notions aren’t bullshit; I’m just saying that the incels didn’t have to get creative to invent them and they don’t have to engage in any form of hardcore social pressure to sell these ideas to people. The idea that women are prizes/property has been burned into our culture for centuries. Unfortunately.
I’m a man and I enjoy challenges. My GF likes to provide challenges to keep me interested.
Last week she brought home a pair of “Rubik’s Panties”.
I came across an article that is startlingly relevant to this thread. Yes, I know that MGTOWs and Incels are not one and the same, but there is a good amount of overlap between the two.
Yikes, I didn’t consider the possibility that a sexbot that was less than 100% docile and compliant could actually be more appealing to a rapist than to a non-rapist who just wants to simulate a relationship with someone.
Hmm… how long before they start making child sex dolls? :(
How do “rape” a non-sentient sexbot? How is this different, morally, from a human couple that are into BDSM?
Wouldn’t it be better that pedophiles focus their attention on child sex dolls than on actual children? Wouldn’t that be a good thing?
If that were the effect it might be a good thing. But it might just as easily have the opposite effect, and encourage their obsession with sex and real children. I feel very uncomfortable about the idea.
I’m not saying you can rape a sexbot.
Sure! And anyone who rents/purchases a child sex doll will go on the permanent sex offender registry so everyone knows to keep their kid from the home of a person who wants to fuck a kid as close to legally and w/o repercussion as possible.
And you register before ordering.
Basically you want to punish people for Thought Crimes. I don’t think a free society should do that.
Wanna get really grossed out? Read Connie Willis’ story “All My Darling Daughters” for a look at what that road could lead to. Basically, in the story all the teenaged girls are getting upset because their boyfriends no longer want to have sex with them because they have these little bioengineered critters with vaginas in them that can’t resist or say no–that scream when you fuck them.
Nightmare fuel, that.
What you think a free society *should *do is biased toward your desires instead of what’s best for society at large. You yourself think pedophiles are a threat, Mr Thought Police.
About two years ago: I’m not linking to the company’s site, but you can Google “Trottla” if you want to be utter, viscerally repulsed. Just don’t do it anywhere near work, and don’t say I didn’t warn you. It’s vile.
And yet you want a free society to pay for your sex toys.
Man, the world is a weirder place than I’d acknowledged. And I used to cover politicians.
Did you cover them with tar, then feathers? That’s really the only way to get rid of them.
Some people are really sick.
Japan has a serious problem with fetishization of young girls, and with pedophilia being semi-acceptable.
Some articles:
Manufacture of child sex robots moves BBC investigative journalist to tears
Japanese adults vent dark obsession with young girls at ‘little idols’ concerts
Just as there already seems to be a correlation between child sex dolls and offenses against real children, I’m sure there will be a correlation between violence against sexbots and violence against real women.
It’s a no-brainer that incels who have sexbots will only be more encouraged to treat real women as objects - which is the cause of their problems in the first place.