You mean a troll being concerned about other trolls? :dubious:
You’re not one of the smart kids, so I’ll tell you very slowly, sock /= troll.
You’re accusing him of being a troll. He’s not a troll, at least not yet.
for what it’s worth, I’ve been coming here daily for a few years now, just never joined.
I’ve read tons of posts of his but, as I’ve only ever clicked on threads made on topics i was interested in, i never read any of his controversial postings or knew of any negative opinions others had of him till reading this thread.
I’d never even clicked on the pit section till after i joined (I’m a general questions & IMHO reader 99.99% of the time).
i think if you look at my few posts in this pit thread you’ll see it’s not like I’m jumping on the dog pile or picking sides so much as just asking questions out of general curiosity and a desire to know how far from or close to reality his claims of success were regarding his online dating.
Well, like I said, welcome to the dope.
wtf?
if I’m not ‘allowed’ to be here and ask questions and possibly, hopefully add to the conversation, then they should have a post count restriction.
until such time or unless yours is the commonly accepted thoughts on the issue by at least some majority here then you can stop it with your unfounded accusations.
thank you. i appreciate that.
Just ignore madsircool, he’s the village idiot here.
I guess it depends on if you were one of the folks he sexually assaulted, circle-jerked with, or took revenge on for not calling when you said you would. 
I dunno, call me nitpicky, maybe…
Kinda surprising you’ve been here for a few years but were unaware of Okrahoma.
I don’t think he’s lying, here. Sounds a little on the childish side.
I have remained blissfully unaware of Okrahoma.
Certainly he seems highly participative for someone unfamiliar with social media and new to posting, but as long as he’s not claiming to be a Scotswoman who was paralyzed in a snowboarding accident at age 14, I’m inclined to give him some space.
That’s our bar. It’s high, sure, but so are our standards. 
“Why are all those people outside the ward chanting ‘Pull the plug’?”
it should have said -
that’S another members name.
and i didn’t say i was unaware of him/her, i said i wasn’t familiar with them.
from looking thru (what I’m going to assume is a him) his past postings today, given the areas he posted in & the topics within those areas, it makes perfect sense why i wasn’t familiar with him.
No dear, YOU missed the point. Here - I will explain again. Women are genetically assigned human beings. ALL Human beings are inherently imperfect. They therefore can’t be classified as anything other than another human being. The only traits they ALL share is that they are all unique, thus share NO commonality than that of genetically classified Human Being. Hence, they cannot be labeled “good” or “bad”. There are too many variables. Ergo, your comments regarding “women”, whether they are family or just “dates”, indicates to the person listening that you dislike women as genetically assigned human beings, and they aren’t worthy of respect. Your backpedaling comments and explanations after the fact don’t do ANYTHING to disabuse that notion to the listener. In my opinion of course. :rolleyes:
That’s alot of fine words that say one thing, He’s a Pig.
None of that is true. What people are missing is that I don’t treat daughters, my mother, female friends or coworkers the same way that I treat dates. Nobody does that because it context dependent and completely different roles. It is a dumb argument. I took care of my daughters all day and then went straight to a date and we both had a great time. We made out at the end and there is no issue with that. Reverse those scenarios and you have a huge problem. I have no idea why people can’t understand this simple concept.
I love women in many different ways. The point where you can get into trouble is when you cross different roles. Men need to understand that as well. Women like romance and sex too. It just needs to be in the right context. The current PC argument seems to suggest not to hit on women at all but that is clearly not nuanced enough.
I would really love to hear your take on that.
Everything you say seems to indicate that you view women as things. Maybe things you enjoy, maybe things you resent, but always things. Maybe you view men the same way, i don’t know.
This is not the viewpoint of someone who " loves women."
Ok that is so hot.
Didja get to 2nd? 3rd?*
Any non-pc slurs on her part?
*ETA: Or as Art Garfunkel in Carnal Knowledge annoying put it, ad nauseum: “And?..AND?..”