I don’t disagree with them. I just can’t agree with them until you actually finish making them. Shagnasty said it was a good thing that German prisoners were treated well. He didn’t say it was a good thing they were treated better than blacks, and you either can’t or won’t explain where he did.
Let’s see:
- So’s your old man
- Takes one to know one
- I’m rubber, you’re glue…
- I know you are. But what am I?
Please select a childish response to go with your simplistic comments.
Are we still arguing, as I already stated that I have low opinion of your…opinions.
Or did you miss that train as well, sparky?
You haven’t even started arguing. As RNATB pointed out, all you’ve done is lie about what Shagnasty said, then refuse to explain why. That isn’t an argument.
Yeah…well…since I didn’t direct the comment that you quoted toward you…there’s probably not much a need to respond to it.
Wow. I make up a hyperbolic and silly extreme to mock your position…
…and it turns out that’s actually what you believe and you fully admit it!
Classic.
Yes. This. We didn’t fully realize at first the level of stupidity we were dealing with.
Do you understand how a message board works?
Yeah, that’s great, but this in the Internet. We’ve all got a dictionary here. What you need to do is show how the dictionary definition applies to anything Shagnasty said.
Yes, it is.
Thanks for that.
I was unaware that I was on the Internet and I only learned that fact after you told me.
Are there any more obvious statements forthcoming or can we all agree that we disagree and drop the matter entirely?
You seem to be unaware of a lot of things. That’s okay. That’s what this board is here for.
Very well done, sir.
Wow, you’re very well spoken…
I fully support this pitting of nevadaexile. What a maroon.
You are a racist piece of cubed wombat shit.
Nobody is struggling under the impression that there is no disagreement here. You see, this is, at least in theory, something called a “discussion”. Saying “we disagree about something” is the START of the discussion, not the end of it. Once a disagreement has been established, participants then go ON to do things like explain their position, show the logic behind it, and even use external citations to support what they think, all with the aim of convincing the other side, or possibly neutral observers, that their convictions are correct.
Or, as an alternate strategy, they flounce off in a hissy fit, refusing to engage with anyone about anything, and leave everyone else all revved up and ready to have a discussion without satisfaction. These people tend to get bad reputations around here, and are often not invited back to the table.
The funny thing is that Shagnasty has said racist stuff in the past.
We can all agree that you’re wrong because you refuse to defend your position. How’s that?
That’s a pretty nice definition of a bigot right there. This Pitting of you is well deserved!!
I agree 100%.
In the interests of fighting ignorance, this statement is shockingly ignorant. The Germans murdered 3.3 million Soviet POWs. Soviet POWs were the second largest group of victims of the holocaust, and the first victims of Zyklon B in the gas chambers. Link to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Malmedy, mentioned upthread by Jackmannii is also just the tip of the iceburg of massacres of prisoners and civilians by the Nazis during WWII. For starters, Wormhoudt massacre, Oradour-sur-Glane, Tulle Murders, Le Paradis massacre, Acsq massacre, and the murder of 156 Canadian and 2 British POWs by the 12th SS Panzer Division Hitlerjugend in Normandy.
I agree 101%.