Not to belabor the point, but…
Not me. Your average “shock jock” caller is nothing like the people I tend to know and hang out with.
“Many”, I would buy. I’m just uncomfortable with the OP’s use of “tend to…”, because it smacks of generalization. Not all men are into the machismo thing.
Mmmmm…the G-spot is generally identified as being along the top wall of the vagina, about a third of the way back.
I suppose you could get there via the back door, as it were, but…
I’m pretty sure you knew I was referring to the prostate. It has to be the closest analog to the female G-spot. Am I wrong?
Okay, yes. But based on my observations, the (non-gay) men who strenuously object to anal penetration by far outnumber the (non-gay) guys who are at all receptive to the idea. Perhaps it’s just that the men who object are more vocal about it than the men who don’t object. After all, anal sex hardly comes up at random IRL.
Thank you, I feel honored.
I’d agree that the guys receptive to the idea are outnumbered by those who have never contemplated it at all. But I’m sure, of those that seem shocked by the idea when the topic arises, quite a few will somewhere down the line experiment a little, whether by themselves or otherwise.
No, I think you’re right - I was joking with you.
My questions has always been - What’s the reason (if there is one) for having such a sensitive organ accessible via only one route? It makes me wonder what glories there may be in touching my spleen.
The same question, with (I guess) similarly-inadequate explanations, could be asked of the clitoris.
Except that the clitoris is extremely obvious and easy to access. The prostate isn’t.
There are many women (and I suppose some men) who would object to that statement! 
Why is the clitoris ‘obvious’, any more than the prostate? By which, I mean ‘obviously capable of creating sexual stimulation’? If it were so obvious, it would be pretty much impossible for a guy to miss it. If I’m not mistaken, the typical magazine advice-column would suggest taking a guy’s hand and showing him what to do. Now, in the interests of equality, can I take a girl’s hand and shove it up my arse?
Ow, better not.
I dislike the idea of someone (male or female) poking down there in a sexual sense, but I find that for solo enjoyment it is a very pleasurable practice. I am sorry, but writing this reminded me of that air freshener comercial, the one with the jingle: “Plug it in! Plug it in!”.
Oh yeah.
Yes, men and women who confuse clitoris with G-Spot. It’s back to Sex Ed. for them… which means having sex with the teacher. That’ll show’em.
Some things should only be shared between a man and his proctologist.
But sex between a man and his proctologist would be unethical.
:eek:
Did you SEE my high school sex ed teacher? Granted, she was a gold medal olympic skier, but that was MANY years ago, and she clearly did not keep up to date with her workout regime.
I don’t think it’s a machismo thing. It’s a comfort zone thing, I guess. I generally dislike being touched below the waist with the exception of playing footsies and sex/foreplay/fooling around. I don’t like be touched casually on the ass or legs and I really don’t like being tickled.
Lady Mung and I have set very few boundaries on our love life, but one of those is the anal area. Luckily, neither one of us is crazy about anal play so we leave well enough alone.
I dated a girl who offered to try anal a couple of times and I turned her down politely each time. It just doesn’t appeal.
However. If you got me steaming, piss drunk, I might change my mind. One of my life’s mantras is a warning to those I meet who have never tried tequila. It comes not from personal experience, but from several first-hand (har) accounts.
Tequila leads to butt-sex.
Winner, 2005 Jose Cuervo Slogan Contest!
Seriously, I may have this put on a t-shirt.
As long as my picture is on there too. I’m glad you enjoy that.