Oh. So you agree with the basic tenets of Political Correctness, then.
… well, actuallly…
Do you have a link to an explicit assertion that he drowned and was eaten by animals? Because the stories I see use words l8ke “probably” and “may have been”.
WHAT video?
Just the fact that it’s an article from a Daily Mail tabloid is reason enough to be suspicious.
Not leopards?
The obviously stupid liberal idea here is that it is worth wasting our time arguing with a troll. Can we move on, please?
I’m happy that liberal stupid ideas are low impact stupid rather than destroying-American-democracy stupid. I do not think there is equivalency between the levels or the effects of the stupidity. However, it is still stupid and should still be called out.
The family is making it about race because the police didn’t do anything after the boy went missing.
Frankly your assertion that he drowned in 6” of water beggars belief. This wasn’t a pool or a pond or a river, it was a field with muddy water in it. People don’t drown in that little water once they are old enough to sit up on their own.
Not the question I asked. I asked for evidence that the term USian is offensive.
And I guess I’ll make explicit what I was implying before: you are, by taking offense at a term that no one finds offensive, acting exactly like how you claim PC people act.
For it to be actual political correctness, you have to establish that the term USian has actually been used in some sort of discrimination against people from the US. Otherwise, you’re just being the “PC police.”
It seems highly unlikely that you actually find “USian” offensive, unless you are inconsistent with your ideology.
I think this here qualifies as a “stupid liberal idea”
Seriously, why are we treating these people. If it is a hoax, let the goddam idiots go untreated.
In a perfect world, the people that have been religiously wearing masks get to go first and people who pushed back against all the restrictions (and anti-vaxxers) can go later.
Of course, not only would that not happen, it would be less safe as well. The people who try to sneak into stores without a mask or the ones going to big parties (and then home to their families or back to work) are the ones most likely to spread it and society will benefit the most from making sure they’re immune.
New idea, all the anti-maskers get to go first. Let them be the early phase 5 trial subjects.
Or a murderer/accessory to. If it has nothing to do with him…? 
Well, this is the time when one has to remember that those who are dying also have families that could still depend on them. Families with sons and daughters that also see the recklessness of their parents and grandparents but can do little about it.
Is the fact that dictionary.com doesn’t recognize that the word even exists evidence of anything?
It’s a contraction of “United Statesian”, which is recognized by Merriam-Webster. It’s only a matter of time until M-W lists the contraction.
Either way, “USian” is as wrong as “American”, because how do you know which US? The country just to the south is the US of M.
What evidence? The Coroner’s report, the security cams that showed no one near him when he drowned, and now the independent autopsy.
So the camera caught him while he drowned?
Not necessarily, but he WAS alone, according to the video evidence.