Stupid liberal idea of the day

[Miller]

@Budget_Player_Cadet

She’s just a bit of an alt-med quack, from what I understand. Or maybe I’m thinking of someone else…

News to me, and she’s been my senator literally my entire adult life.

I tried googling “Feinstein alternative medicine” and got a bunch of hits for some quack named David Feinstein. Also, a bunch of articles from some place called Natural News, which appears to be an unusual combination of lunatic right-wing rhetoric and health woo. They really, really hate Dianne Feinstein, but mostly because of her stance on gun control, not for anything related to alt med.

[Bryan_Ekers]

@Budget_Player_Cadet

She’s just a bit of an alt-med quack, from what I understand. Or maybe I’m thinking of someone else…

You’re not confusing her and Orrin Hatch, are you?

[Budget_Player_Cadet]

Although hey, why don’t we ask **Clothy **- why does he think he’s crazy?

…Nah, wasn’t Hatch. I don’t know. Sorry, my bad.

[Starving_Artist]

@jayjay

You just don’t like them because they don’t want to starve the poor and elderly or bomb everyone but the USA.

:rolleyes:

That’s a stupid liberal idea right there!

[jayjay]

@Starving_Artist

:rolleyes:

That’s a stupid liberal idea right there!

Yes. My experience of what the GOP and conservatives prioritize at the top of their wish list is a stupid liberal idea.

ETA: Oops! Forgive me. I should add keeping the availability of paper towel rolls high to the list.

[Budget_Player_Cadet]

@Starving_Artist

:rolleyes:

That’s a stupid liberal idea right there!

This is Clothahump we’re talking about. At this point, I wouldn’t put it past him.

[Revtim]

@Budget_Player_Cadet

…Nah, wasn’t Hatch. I don’t know. Sorry, my bad.

Maybe Jerry Brown?

[Budget_Player_Cadet]

Barbara Mikulski. Damn, how’d I fuck that one up.

[kaylasdad99]

Dunno. But does the clearing up of this misconception cause you to reassesss your opinion of Sen. Feinstein?

[Budget_Player_Cadet]

I don’t know anything about her, to be honest. Yeah, I’m back to neutral on that.

[Maus_Magill]

What the hell, Budget Player Cadet? This is the Pit, you’re not supposed to admit to an error. You were right all along, Barbara Feinstein is the proponant of Alternative Medicine, despite what the facts say.

Sheeh, kids these days.

[Buck_Godot]

NM

[Really_Not_All_That_Bright]

Here you go:

“On Sept. 10, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed a resolution designating Oct. 7 – Oct. 13 Naturopathic Medicine Week. The resolution recognizes the value of naturopathic medicine in providing safe, effective, and affordable health care and encourages Americans to learn about the role of naturopathic physicians in preventing chronic and debilitating conditions.”

According to Jud Richland, the American Association of Naturopathic Physician’s CEO:

“Passage of this resolution is an historic achievement for naturopathic medicine. The Congress has now officially recognized the important role naturopathic medicine plays in effectively addressing the nation’s health care needs as well as in addressing the increasingly severe shortage of primary care physicians.”

Yes, this is the propaganda line that naturopaths like to promote, that they are actually qualified to help address the shortage of primary care physicians by stepping in and—I kid you not—functioning as primary care providers. (Indeed, Amy Rothenberg did just that on HuffPo several months ago.) It’s utter nonsense, of course, as Peter Lipson helped to demonstrate with his Primary Care Challenge directed primarily at naturopaths. The bottom line is, for all their claims of scientific training, naturopaths are taught a system that includes vitalism, the four humors, and homeopathy as bedrock principles. They base a lot of what they do on prescientific belief systems gussied up with “science-y” sounding justifications. For example, Rothenberg herself uses what I like to refer to as “The One Quackery To Rule Them All” (homeopathy) and even advocates using it for autism.

When I first learned of this Senate Resolution, I was curious who was responsible for it. It turns out that it was Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) who sponsored it. No other sponsors are listed.

[bup]

@Really Not All That Bright

When I first learned of this Senate Resolution, I was curious who was responsible for it. It turns out that it was Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) who sponsored it. No other sponsors are listed.

Dear Senator, I am happy to have honestly liberal people in the august body in which you work. Can you please stop hurting liberalism, not to mention human beings, by endorsing bullshit?

[septimus]

Thanks to diligent Dopers in another thread, a 210-year old liberal scandal has recently come to light. It was perpetrated by none other than Thomas Jefferson, the very founder of the Leftist Marxo-Democrat Party.

@Freddy_the_Pig

The bonds, as per the treaty, paid 6% interest due semi-annually with the principle being redeemed after 15 years…
The Louisiana Purchase raised the US national debt from $70 million to $81 million, at a time when government revenue ran about $10 million per year.

The history books gloss over that this so-called purchase – of land which naturally belonged to the Freedom Lovers™ and which France could never defend – used funds stolen from the Americans’ grandchildren, with Jefferson and the other Liberals paying more than the nation’s entire tax revenue. :mad: :smack:

Shame. Shame on the Marxo-Democrats, whose founder has also been linked, IIRC, to the Illuminati.

[elucidator]

$81 million for Louisiana? We bought a swamp for 81 megabucks? No wonder we hate the French!

[andros]

@elucidator

$81 million for Louisiana? We bought a swamp for 81 megabucks? No wonder we hate the French!

Learn to history, luce.

It was a swamp and a shit ton of desert.
.

[BigAppleBucky]

@elucidator

$81 million for Louisiana? We bought a swamp for 81 megabucks? No wonder we hate the French!

$15 million.

Louisiana Purchase

The U.S. paid 50 million francs ($11,250,000) plus cancellation of debts worth 18 million francs ($3,750,000), for a total sum of 15 million dollars (less than 3 cents per acre) for the Louisiana territory ($234 million in 2012 dollars, less than 42 cents per acre).

Edit: And not all arid land either. Lots of the best farm land in the world was acquired in that purchase.

[elucidator]

Still, cheaper to invade, based on the time honored tradition of contiguous sovereignty. Sure, Lafayette, swell fellow and all, and the French Navy saved our bacon, we’re appropriately grateful, but what had they done for us lately?

[dropzone]

The world’s fair of 1904, celebrating the centenary of the Louisiana Purchase, cost about $15 million, more than the purchase itself, and without all that much inflation over that 100 years. Not a liberal or conservative idea, though most boosters seem to be Republican ;), just a pointless, yet inconsequential, tidbit I’d picked up.