I believe it was ‘sexually active single women’ he had a problem with. Do you want your kids being taught by sluts and whores? HAVEN’T YOU SEEN THE STORIES ABOUT ALL THE POOR FIFTEEN YEAR OLD BOYS BEING SEXED BY THEIR SURPRISINGLY HOT MID-TWENTIES TEACHERS?
As someone who was once a fifteen year old by…hmm…how horrible.
Is that an anagram?
Is the dude French?
That doesn’t sound like a nice Wisconsin name.
Perhaps he’s an illinois immigrant?
Reince Priebus -> Unprecise Brie, Beer Incurs Pie, Rep Incubi Seer.
That last sounds sinister.
I just came across this; wasn’t gonna post it, but it kept nagging at the back of my mind. Like, in a “Did I really just read that? No…it couldn’t have been that bad. Wait, really?” sort of way. After re-reading it a few times, I think I’ve lost a couple IQ points, and I have to make an attempt to expunge the stupidity from my system:
Well the by-line says he is a comedian for Fox. He just isn’t very funny. On reflection that can be said for many of Mr. Murdock’s talents and personalities. They are simply unfunny comedians.
I read the article. Much of it, anyway. Or so it seems.
As I read, I could feel my intellect slipping away. My critical thinking skills dropped toward nadir while my credulity soared. The article began to seem to make sense, and I would have become infuriated at those damn liberals except for my growing ennui. With every word, every sentence, every paragraph, my brain became duller and more reptilian until finally I was lying face down in a puddle of my own drool. I might easily have awakened and gone off to join a tea party or something.
Luckily, at that moment the puddle shorted out my keyboard. The resulting electrical discharge knocked me bolt upright and zapped my brain back into normal (which is to say, liberal pinko) function. Phwew!! That was a close one!
From the 387-plank platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, posted on their website this year:
The function of law is to protect the free exercise of a person’s God-given rights: life, liberty, and the right to property (pursuit of happiness).
We call for the repeal of all mandatory minimum-wage laws.
We call for reinstating, with proper safeguards, the death penalty for murderers, rapists, kidnappers, and drug dealers, with a firm limit of twenty-four months for appeals and no intrusion of federal authorities.
We believe that claims of human-caused global warming are based on fraudulent, inaccurate information, and that legislation and policy based on this information are detrimental to the well-being of the United States.
We believe all individuals and business owners have the freedom to choose the quality of air in their homes and establishments.
We call for the elimination of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
We support the elimination of the Iowa Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Education.
We support the abolition of the IRS.
We call for the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act, eliminating the Federal Reserve, and we support returning to the gold and/or silver standard.
We believe candidates running as Republicans for any local or state office should be required to complete and return to the Republican Party of Iowa a signed questionnaire indicating whether the candidate agrees, disagrees, or is undecided about each plank of the current party platform.
Wasn’t “right to property” in the first draft of the Declaration? I believe some damn libs forced them to take it out … part of a 200+ year socialist plot.
(actually, I’m pretty certain that RtP was in the original draft and some of the underpinning writings)
I think it was (John or George?) Locke’s idea of “life, liberty and property” that Jefferson adapted to “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness”. I have some recollection that Locke’s idea of property included self or self-determination. I have no idea if Jefferson adapted it at the time or had pondered it before drafting the DoI.
(I really should have pulled out my Founding Fathers books again this July 4th.)