Stupid Republican idea of the day

[TonySinclair]

@Morgyn

Fourteen years later? Takes his time smiting, doesn’t he?

Apparently the wingnuts think it’s significant that the crane was allegedly owned by one of the Bin Laden companies, and may have been struck by lightning. But it seems like it would have been a lot more significant if, you know, the lightning had struck Bin Laden himself before Obama got him, instead of indirectly making a Bin Laden kill even more innocent people.

But at least it didn’t happen in the US, so we’re spared the usual clips of near-miss survivors saying, “I know that God was watching over me,” as if the people killed didn’t deserve such attention.

[bup]

Huckabee says that gay marriage is so illegal because it’s confusing.

So Wednesday, he says an overturned SCOTUS ruling from 18-fuckity-fuck is still law, and today he says that an active ruling isn’t really the law.

The job he’s applying for is to be the guy who executes the law of the land. Maybe he’s unclear on what ‘execute’ means in this context.

[eschereal]

Dred Scott v. Sanford is not an “overturned” decision, it stood, AFAIK, until slavery was eliminated via Am. XIII, which made the meat of the ruling irrelevant.

But, really, what is this hard-on the Rs have for the '50s and the wonderful antebellum days of slavery? These guys really need to get called on this.

[Trinopus]

“Overturned” may be the wrong word, but how about nullified, negated, rejected, thrown in the shit-pile of history, pushing up daisies, as relevant as the Code of Hammurabi, or fucked-off-with forever, amen?

[foolsguinea]

Well, I think the parts of it not nullified by the Reconstruction Amendments did continue to be considered good law, and there’s probably one clause of the opinion left that’s still current case law. So, no, it wasn’t actually “overturned” in that sense.

I don’t think that’s what Huckabee is talking about, though.

[ElvisL1ves]

There is, I understand, an ultra-hard-core view that only the original Constitution as ratified is truly God’s word, not any of the human-created, wordly amendments. It’s possible Huck is one of those, but it’s far more possible he’s pandering to his talk-show audience in hopes of higher ratings when he returns to Fox.

[Smapti]

@ElvisL1ves

There is, I understand, an ultra-hard-core view that only the original Constitution as ratified is truly God’s word, not any of the human-created, wordly amendments. It’s possible Huck is one of those, but it’s far more possible he’s pandering to his talk-show audience in hopes of higher ratings when he returns to Fox.

I, for one, eagerly await religious conservatives proclaiming the three-fifths compromise to be the word of God.

[Mr.Greenjeans]

@Smapti

I, for one, eagerly await religious conservatives proclaiming the three-fifths compromise to be the word of God.

Compromise? God (and Stupid Republicans) would never compromise.

[YogSothoth]

@Morgyn

Fourteen years later? Takes his time smiting, doesn’t he?

Hey he promised judgement day for that time we nailed his son to some wood over 2000 years ago, the man likes to take his time!

@bosbfdsfd

Now, if only he applied for food stamps, you might have a point. But continue crying over the idea that lazy clowns who get money for doing nothing should be inconvenienced in any way.

LOL! Of course they should! Some of us pay taxes to keep you fed in your group home even though you can’t work, you should extend that to the poor just as we’ve extended it to you, the stupid and invalid

[CalMeacham]

@Trinopus

“Overturned” may be the wrong word, but how about nullified, negated, rejected, thrown in the shit-pile of history, pushing up daisies, as relevant as the Code of Hammurabi, or fucked-off-with forever, amen?

If they hadn’t nailed it to the perch, it would be pushing up daisies.

[user_hostile]

@bup

Huckabee says that gay marriage is so illegal because it’s confusing.

So Wednesday, he says an overturned SCOTUS ruling from 18-fuckity-fuck is still law, and today he says that an active ruling isn’t really the law.

The job he’s applying for is to be the guy who executes the law of the land. Maybe he’s unclear on what ‘execute’ means in this context.

All Huckabee is required to do is “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States…”. A jar of formaldehyde and some outsourcing security to Walmart’s loss prevention division is likely to meet Huck’s idea of a strict, constructionist approach to the our Constitution.

[marshmallow]

@Leaper

If they’re disabled or unlucky or just not that bright, screw 'em. What good are they?

An example for the rest of the working stiffs to make sure they don’t slack off.

[Biggirl]

@bosbfdsfd

Now, if only he applied for food stamps, you might have a point. But continue crying over the idea that lazy clowns who get money for doing nothing should be inconvenienced in any way.

60% of people collecting SNAP work*, you fucking asshole.

*This figure does not include children, the elderly or the disabled.

[TonySinclair]

@YogSosoth

Hey he promised judgement day for that time we nailed his son to some wood over 2000 years ago, the man likes to take his time!

Not to mention that it took him 4000 years to come up with that solution to the serpent’s 5 minutes of mischief in the garden.

[Mr.Greenjeans]

@marshmallow

An example for the rest of the working stiffs to make sure they don’t slack off.

I think George Carlin said it best:

[QUOTE=George Carlin]
The upper class: keeps all of the money, pays none of the taxes. The middle class: pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there…just to scare the shit out of the middle class.
[/QUOTE]

[j666]

@bosbfdsfd

Now, if only he applied for food stamps, you might have a point. But continue crying over the idea that lazy clowns who get money for doing nothing should be inconvenienced in any way.

I assume the lazy clown was Radel, et al.

[sinjin]

@eschereal

“I will burn down what I gotta burn down. This country and the state need to be saved and it’s not going to happen unless we stand up and scream.”

Well, I understood that :dubious:
I think it has something to do with a piece of clothing with closed sleeves.

I believe it involves burning yer dog and kill’n yer dudes right? Sleeves, not so much.

[digs]

Walker "blames Obama’s ‘absence of leadership’ for attacks on cops."
And claims that the increasing attacks show how Obama doesn’t respect the police.

This from the governor who’s been working at cutting police benefits and their rights to collective bargaining (so, ultimately, their wages).

The last line of the article:
However, according to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, police shooting deaths are actually down 26 percent this year, compared to the same period last year.

So, not only are his conclusions wrong, but his facts are, too (though compared to a fence to keep out those crafty Canadians, this is tame).

[BrainGlutton]

@eschereal

“I will burn down what I gotta burn down. This country and the state need to be saved and it’s not going to happen unless we stand up and scream.”

Well, I understood that :dubious:
I think it has something to do with a piece of clothing with closed sleeves.

If the sleeves are closed, how can you handle a gun?!

[E-DUB]

Scott Walker seems to be the poster boy for reasoning incorrectly from invalid data.