It’s only after they discover that people in Peru actually have the internet that they admit that it’s actually a photo from an evangelical revival that took place over a year ago.
Holy shit. That’s almost the exact plot of a Dan Brown novel, down to the right-wing blowhard.
If he keeps this up, he’ll never get Ben Carson’s vote.
Your know who else uses water…?
Planned Parenthood!
I understand everything about this but their retraction. Their target audience would absolutely have swallowed it, no matter what proof that it was false was offered. All they had to do was blame the “liberal media” for smearing the innocent Kim Davis. Worked for O’Reilly.
:rolleyes: Half will nominate moot for everything, and half will nominate whoever is the current leader of national white supremacism.
I think the word is “indignance.” Or more commonly “indignation.”
Representative attempts to use a fake graph from an anti-abortion activist group in the Planned Parenthood hearing, is called out publicly on his bull.
I’m curious what the video may have been.
Aside from the fact he has been a total homophobe it appears McMillin has had trouble with videos and explicit pictures in the past. He got in trouble sexting with the girlfriend of a guy he was prosecuting in 2005. This website has a rather graphic description of what the pictures showed him doing.
Dude has some issues.
“According to two sources close to the case, the photos were incredibly graphic. One photo reportedly shows McMillin masturbating and using a dildo on himself while others were simply of McMillin’s genitalia. In one exchange, McMillin is alleged to have texted Stapleton that he was heartsick being separated from her and sent photos of himself masturbating with a string tied tightly from his testicles to the wheels of a rolling office chair to illustrate his pain.”
I like that he actually lied in a Congressional hearing; is that against the law?
No. No, you didn’t. Liar.
Not if he’s a member of Congress; they have immunity.
Thanks; I thought that was prolly the case. :mad:
Many times in the past I did point at what would happen to the right wingers that only rely on their extremist sources of information, they eventually will show to all the baseless claims that they are working with. Sooner or later they do step on their dicks by showing all the stupid information that they are relying on.
So the Republican congress critters are not only using adulterated videos being passed as real ones, they are swallowing the whole hook line and sinker lies that the Right wing groups are passing as “information”.
Even so, it would have been gold if Richards would have retorted “Am I the only one under oath here?”.
And now her lawyer’s saying she had a secret meeting with the Pope.
[QUOTE=Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)]
I pulled those numbers directly out of your corporate reports.
[/quote]
I was really hoping she would say, “No, you didn’t. You pulled those numbers directly out of your ass.”
But you can’t say that to congressperson, can you–not even one who’s lying, in session.
Which one; the real Pope, or some impostor who believes in climate change and is against the death penalty?
Is there an Avignon, Kentucky?
But a Congressmen can apparently yell it at a sitting president during a SOTU speech. :mad: