Before we figure how best to repopulate the human race from 40 people sent into space, we must ask ourselves : do we really want to start this shitshow over someplace else ? I mean, if we end up skullfucking the Earth hard enough that we can’t live on it any more and our last hope is to try again on some other planet, I figure we probably shouldn’t get to. WE HAD ONE JOB !
Do you remember the “wedding” scene from “A Boy and His Dog?” The women were married to little vials of genetic material.
For ideal maximization of genetic diversity, after each baby, the mother would then be married to a different vial of genetic material. So, to answer your question with another question, does the custom of serial monogamy “necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship?” (e.g. Hollywood marriages?)
When you think about it, all the space people should be homosexuals. Lesbians can still carry babies, and you want the best possible progeny, so all the fertilization would be in vitro for idealized selection. You sure as hell do not want the men copulating with the women, because that makes the breeding process too random. For that matter, if there are only 40 people going out, they would all be females, accompanied by a freezer full of spooge.
Not sure if you could establish enough genetic diversity from such a small cohort, though.
Shh! The first rule of the homosexual agenda is to not talk about the homosexual agenda.
Seriously though, it’s not a bad idea. Gays and lesbians generally have to plan their reproduction and not just get drunk and oops, another random kid. If you’re starting with a low population and you’ll have to carefully control breeding, gays and lesbians are a good bet.
And sending that water to the delta is not what’s causing the drought, which is what Trump was implying. It’s a standard right-wing tactic; blame the commie pinko bleeding heart environmentalists, who are more concerned about a little fish than they are about farmers.
No one mentions the fishermen of course; that might make people stop and think rather than blindly hate, and that could lose votes.
After this, I realize one thing is sure. There is no stupid thing he could possibly say that would turn off his adherents. And no lie either, no matter how big.