What has happened in Orlando is just the beginning. Our leadership is weak and ineffective. I called it and asked for the ban. Must be tough
How would his ban have helped? The guy was born here. Unless the ban means rounding up American citizens amd deporting them to where, exactly?
I think Trump could overplay his hand here. While some restrictions will have a certain visceral impact on those who don’t already agree with him 100%, it’s very easy to go juuuuust over the line of where most people think the government should go, and it sounds like he’s in danger of stepping over that line.
I’ll just note that when the Nazi government of Germany fell our war didn’t continue with Germany.
But we’ll just skip over the fate of Japan and it’s emperor and the fascists in Spain.
The enemy has to be named? Well yes . . . that’s why we’re at war with Al-Qaeda, ISIS(L), the Taliban (not to be confused with any other Islamic fundamentalist political movements in Afghanistan (et al.) that we do/have supported), and a long list of other specifically named groups and persons.
Some folks want this to be a “Clash of Cultures” and get some final closure on that whole Crusades thingy . . . and they ain’t all Muslims! :eek:
Ah, so we don’t name the enemy. I’m beginning to see into the minds of liberals. Unless that enemy is a “sickness in American society”. Then it’s okay to paint with that broad brush.
Seriously, how hard is it to say “ISIS”? Is eliminating ISIS now something only Hitler would want?
The tone deafness of prominent liberals is incredible. It’s like they want Trump to win. News flash: When a foreign terrorist organization directs an attack on Americans, that’s not a gun control debate, that’s a war strategy debate. Tom Brokaw says Americans should say “no more”. He’s absolutely right. ISIS must be obliterated. At which point Brokaw will wring his hands and say, “These attacks are unpreventable, we just have to live with this new normal.”
Why not? That’s what the NRA says about mass shootings all the time.
Anyway, I’m guessing that there are a dozen mechanisms in the intelligence community working like mad right now to determine how much contact the shooter actually had with ISIS. If they did anything more substantial than encourage this dude, then claim credit after the fact, I’m sure we’ll know soon enough.
“We are not at war with ISIS (or ISIL :dubious:), we are at war with radical Islamic terrorism.”
Remember, the problem is the insistence on naming the bad guys by their actual name(s) and not using a correct term that must include some variation of Islam and/or Muslim!
I didn’t actually say he had to use that exact phrase, only that he name the enemy clearly and not try to divert to make it seem like WE did this. Which he didn’t do. I thought his speech struck most of the right notes.
I was taking issue with a lot of what’s on Facebook and Twitter from liberals afraid to even say “terrorism” and are engaging in classic Blame American Firstism.
We just need to trick them into saying their name backwards, and they’ll get banished to the Fifth Dimension. Luckily, all we have to do is getting them talking about the President of Egypt.
The NRA loves to pretend to support things that won’t make any difference. But, let’s say violent video games actually were the source of the “evil monsters” hiding among us. Let’s say we got rid of the violent video games. No more more evil monsters, and no more need for guns, right?