Stupid Republican idea of the day

So you do see it.

As usual, the Buddhists are the least problematic of the world’s major faiths, with Jews a close second.

Careful with that broad brush there adahar, you might paint yourself in a corner.

That’s exactly the point - even though the majority of American Muslims oppose gay marriage (and honestly, 42% in favor was a higher number than I expected), they’re still more supportive of it as a group than are the Christian evangelicals in the GOP who are claiming to be the true defenders of LBGT people.

Not to mention there’s like 5 Muslims in the entire US. Quite a few more rabid evangelicals.

5? There must be HUNDREDS! :eek:

Snopes has delivered an epic smackdown to a Daily Caller columnist who attempted to smear one of their writers for repeatedly debunking him.

Snope snap!

Maybe only 5 Muslims in the entire United States, but 40% of those are members of Congress! (Keith Ellison and André Carson).

Yeah right, like I’m going to believe that. Neither of those guys is even named Muhammad.

How do you know? Maybe that’s their secret.
Did you know that very few people are aware that Obama’s middle name is HUSSEIN?

:smiley:

Fox: Gay journalists like Anderson Cooper are biased.

Unlike the white conservatives on Fox.

The Hon. Keith Ellison, (D-Minn.) is a Lutheran Muslim, a subset of Islam that is more bland, but less exciting.

As I said to my pastor after a trip to a mosque and an explanation of Islam, “They’re closer to us than Mormons.”

When referring to groups and possessing actual data, there’s nothing wrong with generalizations. Are you suggesting the poll shouldn’t have been taken at all, lest it paint the particular religious groups with a broad brush?

In the US, perhaps, but the Rohingya and othersmay have a different view on that

Your “actual data” was a survey on opposition to gay marriage.

If I’m not mistaken, the only Presidents who have publically supported gay marriage are Clinton, Obama, and GHW Bush. Based on that actual data, would you say that they are the three least problematic Presidents the US has had?

Or at least, the people who self-identify as such in the US tend to be disproportionately aligned with liberal democratic values. (As other posters have been quick to point out when we’re talking about US Muslims.)

Elsewhere in the world, no Buddhist-majority country has legal same-sex marriage, and several of them criminalize same-sex sexual behavior. The only Jewish-majority country, Israel, also doesn’t permit same-sex marriage (though they do recognize same-sex marriages performed in other countries).

So I presume that given this additional actual data, you’re okay with modifying your position to say that (at least with regard to LGBT rights) the Buddhists are not “the least problematic of the world’s major faiths”, given that many Christian-majority countries (as of recent years) are much farther along with recognizing LGBT rights than Buddhist-majority countries are.

This is the problem with such silly broad-brush generalizations: as soon as you’re confronted with specific factual detail, you have to go back and erase or modify most of your brushstrokes.

[QUOTE=Senegoid]
Maybe only 5 Muslims in the entire United States, but 40% of those are members of Congress! (Keith Ellison and André Carson).
[/QUOTE]

Well, granted, still it doesn’t seem fair to tar the other 3 just because a pair of rogues share their religion.

:smiley:

Yes, they fast all day during Ramadan, then gorge on a gormet lutefisk & lefsa banquet! :slight_smile:
Actually, Keith was a good catholic boy until he converted during college. And remember what famous Jesuit St. Francis Xavier said:

.