Stupid Republican idea of the day

Bayesian probability. If he’s able to get elected in 2016, enough shenanigans will go on in the intervening time to ensure that 95% of the current black electorate will evaporate.

And he said this nonsense in a town that is 93% white. :smack:

Wow, Mr. Trump. You sure do have some balls on you to speak so frankly to an overwhelmingly white crowd. A less brave candidate would have drove that message home to a predominantly black crowd. Where I’m sure that message would have been much more well received. :rolleyes:

Oh, no, not really, but thanks!

Okay, if you’re Not Sure then you might be the smartest person the planet in 500 years or so.

It’s OK. He’s got a token black guy in the crowd. He’s sitting there behaving, OK ? So he’s Trump’s African-American, and you can’t have him. Period.

In 2010, 72 women died from pregnancy-related complications in Texas.

In 2011, Texas sharply reduced the budget for family planning, resulting in the closure or reduction of services of many Planned Parenthood and other women’s health clinics.

In 2012, 148 women died from pregnancy-related complications in Texas.

Beats the hell out of me.

Here’s a much better article than the Fox source; go figure:

Breitbart can’t be racist, one of its top writers is “incredibly gay”.

And by “top writer”, he means Milo Yiannopoulos.

“Openly gay”? Sure, makes sense. “Incredibly gay”? Not at all sure what that means unless it means stereotypically gay. This guy, I don’t know about, only connect second hand, by noting that people who’s opinion I respect loathe him more than licorice flavored liver.

So, anyway, these people admire his vile and loathsome opinions so much they can tolerate his being gay? Gee, that’s swell.

As if Milo has ever been a top…

+1

Here’s the latest (and strangest) conspiracy theory the right is in love with; Obama is sending “lesbian farmers” and “transgender hillbillies” to infiltrate and conquer red states.

Rush has bitter memories of when they made him squeal like a pig back in '72. Couldn’t have been easy on his deferment excuse…

You mean like this?

http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/S/d/f/2/iowa-gay-marriage.jpg

I don’t care when most people mistake a father/daughter portrait for a couple, but a journalist/political cartoonist (who should have some grounding in art) should know better.

(a) Cite? Wikipedia is certainly not the ultimate authority here, but it says that it’s disputed

(b) As long as the majority of the audience believes, mistakenly or not, that the two subjects are a married couple, then the cartoon is still effective.

Art Institute of Chicago.

“When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”

The image has been used as a man-and-wife icon for decades and decades. The cartoonist in this instance is only about the thousandth – maybe the ten-thousandth – to have used it in this way.

(Cute cartoon! Hurrah for human rights!)

[

](American Gothic - Wikipedia)
So 11 years after the painting was made public, and after his sister had already spun it, he wrote a [this in a letter:

](http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/10/they-are-basically-solid-and-good.html)which was followed immediately by:

IMO he took up his sister’s rationale because it pleased him to please her regarding the painting and, after all, the exact relationship of the people to each other was not germaine at all to what was depicted, in Mr. Wood’s opinion.

But in Texas they have $1.6 million to give away to an anti-abortion group whose leader has twice said AIDS can be spread via fetal tissue flushed down a sewer.