You’re trying to logic this up. These people don’t have logic. They wouldn’t recognize actual logic if it came up out of their toilet and bit them in the balls. Disdaining homosexuals kept them from being out and public. It was only after they started trying to trick people into accepting them as human beings that they began to pop up everywhere. Therefore, trying to get society to disdain them again is the way to fix all of that. Once all those gays realize that society’s not going to coddle them anymore, they’ll stop being gay (since it’s a choice, after all) and go back to getting married and having kids like the good Lord intended.
You know, people who don’t spend every hour of every day thinking about the gays. About fighting them. About their lewdness and evil and how contagious their wickedness is. About opposing them. In hot tubs. NO ! NO ! Bad thought !
Yeah he’s something special.
Right now he’s the sole senator blocking legislation to stop exploding gas mains. Even the gas companies are on board with it. Coburn was also blocking unanimous consent but it’s been covered in the past he does that for every bill in the senate, even he stepped back and said let this one go through. So finally we have something 99 senators can agree on and out hero Rand Paul has come in to stop it.
Yes, that’s it. What’s so hard to understand? Think about it: if being gay was illegal, then it follows that some (as of yet unknown) percentage of people would not engage in homosexual activity. Whatever you think about sexual preference being a choice or not is irrelevant; the key is that fewer people would choose to engage in homosexual activity. Therefore, in terms of strict percentages of the population, a decrease in homosexual activity will necessarily lead to some Republicans leading longer political lives. See: Mark Foley, Larry Craig, Bob Allen, Roy Ashburn …
OK, but being gay is not a choice, but being Republican is. Not suggesting any course of action, you understand. Just sayin’, is all.
I think they’ll go for denying health and life insurance to gays, or charge them an extra premium, as their “risky choices” raise the cost for the rest of us. Something like smoking.
Apparently, Rick Santorum is either deaf or covering his ass for something stupid he thought he could get away with. I’m leaning towards the latter, especially because his timing seems to wait until the boos die down… Anal lube and fecal matter indeed, this one.
The Man Who Will Never, Ever Be King.
The Republican parties village idiot, Louie Gohmert, is out talking again. This time his argument against Obama’s job bill is it is a gay conspiracy designed to discourage marriage by providing tax incentives for unmarried couples. Experts reading the proposal can’t seem to find what the fuck he’s talking about but if Louie Gohmert says somethings in the bill by golly it must be.
This man in my opinion really is the stupidest man in congress and there is a lot of competition for that title. He seems like a perfect candidate for the the Republican presidential primary why isn’t he running?
Perhaps I can assist you, I’m a native Texan and I still speak Goober. If we offer the same tax encouragement we offer to married couples to persons living in fornicative situations, then we encourage all manner of perversion. A state of marriage must be incentivized, otherwise who would do such a thing? Why buy a cow when Cheez-Whiz is cheaper?
It takes some damn hard work to earn that title, given the high level of competition in the field…
“The Republican parties Village Idiot” will never replace “Republicans boo gay” as the GOP dance anthem.
That’s what I call “looking out for the little guy”!
Well, think of the overall savings- this would fire the 300 dwarf-bar tossing inspectors , resulting in a huge tax savings. That, together with the closure of the main dwarf-tossing regulatory commission and not having to rent the dwarf-tossing regulatory headquarters office block will result in over $50,000,000/year being returned to the state coffers.
That’s not a teeny tiny amount of savings!
but should at least be noted here, bringing back the firing squad:
http://news.yahoo.com/fla-lawmaker-wants-bring-back-firing-squads-110708935.html
If you sponsor a ‘legal carry’ law, you probably shouldn’t be caught doing this:
http://news.yahoo.com/fla-lawmaker-wants-bring-back-firing-squads-110708935.html
I gotta get back to work…
Those are the same article.
When he finishes wasting his time working, maybe he’ll come back and float the right link.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Should have been this link:
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/oct/12/sponsor-of-tennessee-guns-in-bars-bill-charged/
Bonus mugshot picture…