Stupid Republican idea of the day

I remember criticism of Reagan being called “blasphemy”. This is actually an improvement.

It’s wrong on top of Kool-aid flavoured nuts. Regicide is when you kill the guy, not just depose him. AFAIK impeachment does not end in front of a firing squad.

It’s when you kill a regent, or king.

Not so quick. Trump thinks he is the chosen one.

That Stupid Republican is a liar.

The announcement of Burkman and Wohl’s press conference to bring forth an alleged sexual partner of Kamala Harris. I don’t know what Election 2020 HQ means, but I think it’s Burkman’s house, based on the Google Maps image.
https://scontent.fmcc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/71537954_10220225605092144_8059971473470652416_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_oc=AQk9RUT8bbtgcVBQzO5Nh_8K2HhPByV_VIJFt-IFums9eVcdHIuIxsJk8zqOcvFrVxw&_nc_ht=scontent.fmcc1-1.fna&oh=80e1efd25acbda5f6b47bf2c401c550e&oe=5E2B90A9

Yeah. its just another fancy name they gave to themselves to sound important.

Time for more Cargo Cult scandal making.

Not too sure “this female candidate bangs good looking dudes in their twenties!” is doing harm to any reputations here, but it could be me. Now I actually want the Cougar Ticket to be a thing.

Trump has had a way more scandalous sex life (divorces, affairs, prostitutes) than the shit that Wohl has been making up about others. I don’t get it! I guess another instance of It’s Okay When A Republican Does It.

What a good idea, though!

Redundant statement.

[Moderating]
Please don’t joke about killing the President of the United States on the boards.

No warning issued.
[/Moderating]

Coming from you, that’s a pretty authoritative statement.

Maybe, but I’d still like to hear from Mr. Moose and Bunny Rabbit before accepting that assessment.

A firing squad ordered by an impeachment tribunal would not be just a ‘killing’, it would be a proper, legally sanctioned execution. Which we are allowed to tqalk about on the board. We have had many threads on capitl punishment.

No warning accepted.

Nah. I don’t think “an impeachment tribunal” is a thing in the first place, let alone having the authority under the law to order an execution. The constitution sets out what impeachment is and the consequence if the senate trial finds the president guilty: removal from office. You will not that it does not say “removal with extreme prejudice”.

Nor do I think your acceptance or non-acceptance of a warning has any effect here either.

[Moderating]
You were instructed to drop this subject. If you feel that instruction was made in error, the proper place to discuss it is in ATMB.

This is a formal warning for failure to follow a moderator’s instructions.
[/Moderating]

Lindsey Graham wants Senate Republicans to sign a pledge not to vote for convicting Individual 1 during impeachment.

So he’s asking the Senate - the body that sits in judgement - to pre-emptively judge the case before the investigation by the House has even started. Before any of the evidence has been collected, and in fact, while the Whitehouse is refusing to provide any of the requested evidence.

Okay then. As long as the American public buys this bullshit, they will continue to sell it.

Republicans sure are big on swearing oaths to each other. It would be nice if they paid attention to the one that they swore when they were elected. You know, the one to their country.

Eh, Trump seems to think that his not accepting an impeachment enquiry makes a difference. Maybe that’s where the mentioned poster got that notion.