Stupid Republican idea of the day

How much you wanna bet she heard her husband crying out “Oh God! Oh God!” in the spare bedroom with the pool boy, and his excuse was that they were praying that Hillary loses?

Nice response from David Silverman in the article:

I still find it humorous that members of the party of god are so filled with hatred of others and against anything benefitting anyone other than themselves.

From the same article:

How very Christian of you, you evil witch.

But is she wrong in her strategic reasoning?

Yeah, I’ve been told Hillary has been known to ride in chariots of iron, so it’s looking grim on this one, I’ll be honest.

Oh, but there are things you can say about it. Have a look at Sept 9 Rachel Maddow show highlighting this excursion into foreign policy:

From the transcript:

That was kinda cruel. I mean about SNL.

. . . and her ovaries are as globes of brass.

The very fact of a Republican administration would be such hell in and of itself that the backlash hell you describe would be lost in the noise…

I think shes right in this sentence fragment.

[QUOTE=Bachmann]
we have no idea what the Lord God will do for us in 2016.
[/QUOTE]

I’m genuinely curious – to what degree are Congress critters allowed to go on junkets overseas and make pronouncements on foreign policy? That seems like the province of the State department. So when Bachmann, say, implies that the official US policy is to blame the Muslim Brotherhood for 9/11 and we support the overthrow of the government in Egypt, and it turns out that this is not the official US policy – what’s the response? Does she get a very nasty phone call from John Kerry? The Speaker of the House? If it leads to an international incident or some Benghazi-like repercussions, could she be censured by the House?

There is no restriction on where members of Congress can go or what they can say to whom, aside from the same laws that apply to everyone else. Indeed, they get immunity from anything arising from anything they say on the floor of the House or Senate.

The House of Representatives can decide for itself when or why to censure a member, but it has not done so very often. Theoretically, they could, but u could think they’d be reluctant to censure a member for doing what they might themselves sometimes do.

The secretary of state could certainly write a nasty letter to a member of Congress, but it would have no legal consequence. Congress is equal to the president, so the secretary of state is below Congress.

She can be censured by the House for any reason. There are minimal statutory or Constitutional limitations on the internal processes of the House and Senate. Having said that, negotiation by unauthorized persons (the POTUS or his delegates) with foreign governments is a criminal violation of the Logan Act.

Speaking of which, Representative Steve King is in danger of censure by Representative Steve King, who has made his opposition to this sort of activity very clear:

Steve King is not going to like it when he finds out what Steve King has been up to…

Fortunately, IOKIYAR…

Throw Steve King and Steve King into the inter-universe magnetic corridor, blow up their ship, and they shall trouble us no more.

I’m guessing that the Texas State Board of Education is either entirely or majority Republican.

Seems they’re back to trying to force text book publishers into including creationism in the science texts again.

'scuse me. It’s not the BoE doing this. It’s their reviewers.

“As an educator, parent, and grandparent, I feel very firmly that ‘creation science’ based on Biblical principles should be incorporated into every Biology book that is up for adoption.”

The brazen stupidity here is almost admirable.

A misplaced quote there. Should be creation ‘science’…

Perhaps. I don’t generally edit quotes to reflect my personal feelings, however.

Ted Cruz thinks we “need 100 more like Jesse Helms” in the U.S. Senate.

Well, at least Cruz wouldn’t have a seat anymore.