Thou shalt have no other beverages before Me.
That’s the same article I was remembering. It’s dated December 12th and mentions the Justice department originally planning to file charges “last week”, well after the election. I don’t see anywhere that says that they were ready to press charges before the election. Did I miss it somewhere?
[My last hijack post on this subject I promise]
Oops, maybe I got the dates wrong. I thought I’d seen a report somewhere else that it was delayed until after the election.
*Hail Pepsi, full of pop.
Our burps are with thee.
Blessed art thou among colas,
and blessed is the fruit of thy bottle,
Gases.
Holy Pepsi, Mother of Colas,
pray for us drinkers,
now and at the hour of our thirst.
Amen.
*
Satanist! Anticokist! BURN HIM
RC is the One True Cola.
The atheistic Uncola, aka 7-Up!
How 'bout a Fresca?
(bolding mine)
Shouldn’t that be Pepsist ? 
At what age were you Peptized?
Sorry, my reading comprehension has apparently gone straight to hell. In my perception, you were quite clearly implying that your right to hold (and express) an opinon was being discussed as though people actually consider it up for a popular vote. That sort of thing tends to be viewed as the behavior of a self-proclaimed martyr.
I’ll tell you right here: nobody here considers your rights to hold and express opinions to be subject to the votes of anyone else. That you consider being told that that opinion is so deeply in the minority that it will never carry the day to be a personal attack is mind-bogglingly sad, IMHO.
As for you finding the “get off the cross” bit to be insulting, I confess that I was actually aiming for “dismissive,” with perhaps a taste of “condescending”; I suppose I’ll have to take responsibility for screwing that part up. Please forgive me.
(We are still in the Pit, right?)
Sorry, that was revoked.
What does the United Tea Party of Kentucky have to say on the matter?
Splitters!
“People called liberales, they go the house!”
I consider both of these sentences as condescending, and, therefore in the direction of insulting. When I am clearly making a statement that is perfectly obviously somewhat iconoclastic, I don’t need to be told that it is a minority opinion. I’m taking the trouble to state it in the first place precisely because of that.
So, yes, when someone states the obvious as if it is some kind of rhetorical victory, it feels like someone is talking down to me.
Arkansas Republican legislator wants to make sure that uninsured people in Arkansas don’t know that they can apply for the Affordable Care Act - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/18/nate-bell-health-care_n_4810739.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013
Ascenray, I realize that it is extremely UNLIKELY to be your actual name, but may I call you Francis?
Just once?
Please?