Fair enough. I think you are way off the mark, but I can see how it might look that way. Let me see if I can ‘fields’ me some of these Elysian issues . . .
I would much prefer that what I said wasn’t true. If it were up to me the world would work like a Meg Ryan movie; sweet words, good intentions, honesty, loyalty, chivalry, and calling when you say you will would be the best ways to maintain and develop a relationship. At first, when I was much younger, that is how I would play it. Then, time after time, the girls would end up with the bad boy type. They’d end up sleeping with someone who treats them terribly, and telling me how sweet I was (while not sleeping with me). I wasn’t getting laid. Then, I had a few philosphical conversations with some older friends. They told me some of the secrets. I tried it, and I have been lucky in love ever since. One approach works and one doesn’t. The one that works is not the one that I wish worked, but I don’t make the rules - the best I can hope to do is figure them out and adapt.
I used to be so disgusted by the make-up-break-up-make-back-up, always fighting type of couples. Then I started dating a girl who was really into drama. She loved to push my buttons and get me mad. We’d argue, then she loved to make up with great sex. The whole gambit of emotions was a turn-on to her. She liked the conflict, she liked pushing me to insult and fight with her, and then she liked making up afterwords. I was conflicted. Here I was in the type of relationship I had always mocked. Then I saw the movie Secretary. A brilliant film (spoilers coming), in which a girl who has a history of self-wounding is released from an institution for the mentally ill. She gets a job as a Secretary for a lawyer who has a fetish for inflicting humiliation. At first one gets the impression that the lawyer is a ‘cold, calculating, unloving man who manipulates people into behaving the way he wants’. You think to yourself, “This bastard, taking advantage of this sick woman.” But by the time the movie is over, it is revealed that the two are a perfect match. They find true love and I always cry at the end of that movie. It turns out she is exactly what he needs, and he is the same to her.
My point is that I no longer think that there are good or bad relationships per se. There is no ideal way to treat women based on some generic ideal that ends with a mariage, 2.5 kids, a lake house and a mini-van. Relationships come in all different shapes and sizes. If someone gets turned on by conflict, what’s wrong with that? I do not hate women. I don’t find the common propensity to seek out relationships with conflict to be an indicator of any type of flaw, or a reason to consider one person of lesser worth than another. Rather, I recognise it as an unchangeable factor in many people. So if I meet someone who seems to be ths type of person, and I am interested, than how is giving them what they want a bad thing? If my choice is between not having a relationship with someone who turns me on, or acting like a “player”, then I’m going to slip into the role - not for me (I want movie love, ideally) - but for them.
I can see how this attitude may seem contradictory, but if you think about it, it does make sense. I act from love, but sometimes agression and apathy are tools necessary to keep the love flowing. I have learned this, and if using that knowledge makes me a bad person, then oh well. I love women. The women in my life have made my life better time after time. I ‘play’ because they want me to, not because I hate them. And to those ladies out there who aren’t like this, the (some say mythical) 2-percenters, I hope I find one of you some day. So far all the women I have dated love the drama. I’ve lost faith in the two percent, but hope springs eternal. In the meantime I’ve gotta go with what works because I like a nice warm body to curl up to at night. And cute as my cat is, it just isn’t the same. . .
DaLovin’ Dj