My point esprix, is that j_kat_251 mentioned cocksucking, cuntmunching, fucking assholes, and then called the people in the thread fuckwads and whores. Yet you only registered “cocksucker.”
Why?
Why must we hijack every single thread that includes that word? Why must we assume that it is either disparages homosexuals or degrades the act of cocksucking?
I am a mother fucker. I have, at one point in my life, fucked a woman who had a child. But I don’t go around hijacking threads that use the phrase mother fucker because I understand it’s a generic insult. It’s not truly meant to make a political statement nor to say “inserting an object into the vagina of a woman who has previously spawned is a awful act.”
You’re a cocksucker. I’m a motherfucker. They can be literal, yes, but sometimes they can just be insults. Insults that have no relevence to the reality of the situation. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Um, because the name of the thread is “Thanks, cocksuckers”? Thus indicating that there is perhaps some additional significance to that epithet than the others? Oh, and there’s that thing about how generally speaking “cocksucker” is not used as a derogatory term for “woman” but often is for “gay man”?
Not meaning to speak for Esprix who I’m sure will be along himself to explain it to you…
The difference is that motherfucker is almost never used literally. Cocksucker, however, is frequently used literally to harass and demean gay men. Perhaps gay men are sick of hearing it.
Well, Enderw24, my analysis indicates that your complaint is off base.
A bare textual reading of the term “cocksucker” posits a set, cocksuckers, membership in which is not based on gender but rather on sucking or having sucked one or more cocks.
It is possible to extrapolate from the multiple “Ask the Gay Guy” threads and the post above that Esprix is a member of that set.
Your post was the first mention of gender or indeed of homosexuality per se in this thread, as Esprix was speaking not as a member of the subset of male cocksuckers but rather as a member of the set of cocksuckers as a whole.
The proper complaint, I think, would be that by presuming to speak on behalf of cocksuckers everywhere, Esprix was being arrogant.
Of course, I didn’t get the latest newsletter yet so it’s possible that he’s been appointed as an official representative or something, in which case even that complaint would be invalid.
But don’t you see? It wasn’t being neither to harass, nor to demean gay men. It was used as a reference to people in a still unlinked to thread.
People. Men AND women. If a gay man happened to post in there, and if j_kat_251 happened to be referencing that particular gay man, it would have been entirely coincidental.
It was an insult. A generic insult against a group of people who are not you and, for all you may know, could be entirely composed of women. But that’s ok, because nobody here seems to be the least bit upset over “cuntmunchers”!
Cocksucker is gender neutral. Since it seems that noone can understand that, I’m going to type it out again. Cocksucker is gender neutral.
If, and when, it is used to disparage homosexuals I give you free reign to tell people it is insulting. But that it is “frequently” used to do so, doesn’t mean it is always used to do so.
It surely doesn’t mean we must hijack every fucking thread that ever contains the word.
While I am somewhat boggled by the idea that you can only express your anger in terms of sex, here’s the link. j_kat_251, I rather hope you aren’t actually having sex with anyone yet.
So since the only subset into which I fall would be cocksuckers, I naturally replied as such. I do not believe at any time I limited the community of cocksuckers to gay men. Isn’t it interesting how you automatically read it that way? I mean, I do, but then, I’m a gay man; but in this instance, that wasn’t what I was referring to. Using “cocksucker” (or, for that matter, “cuntmuncher”) as an insult is confusing, if not just asinine (not to mention libelous to those of us who enjoy the activity, regardless of gender or sexual orientation).
So, instead, I put it to you - what’s your damage?
(Oh, and 2trew, aren’t you on the e-mail distribution list? That memo went out ages ago! )
Esprix
[sup]1[/sup]As an adjective, rather than a verb
[sup]2[/sup]Some might disagree
Didn’t you know, Esprix, you’re actually supposed to get permission from OxyMoron to be offended. He’s the only qualified gay man to ascertain when offense is to be taken.
How did I learn that? Well, I objected to the term shirtlifter and was scolded by him with:
So the case is closed. You can’t get offended by words. :rolleyes:
Doesn’t it suck when you don’t get what you want? And yeah, she sucks cock. However I don’t call her a cocksucker because I recognise it’s an insult. But I firmly believe it’s only an insult to the person it’s directed at, not every one who does and has ever sucked cock, or even thought about sucking cock.
Thanks for everyone who is on the “cocksucker is a generic insult and not meant to insult gay men/hetero women/transvestite donkeys with straws or any other particular class/group/category of people”.
Boo hiss fuck ya to everyone who gets their panties in a wad totally unnecessarily. Did anyone open this thread expecting to see a fully-fledged rant against homosexuals? Because maybe whoever did could just find offense basically anywhere. OMG I will totally sue Enid Blyton for the opening sentence of Noddy Goes to Town. I didn’t mean any offense, except to the assholes (CAN HE * SAY * THAT? ) who totally spoilt the plot tension of the next few episodes. On an unrelated note, I don’t suppose it would do any good to tell you that I’m a mate of the president of our student “queer” affiliation, because anyone who says “some of my best friends are jews/blacks/women/gays/people who have frosted tips” is a fucking liar for sure. Also thanks to the person who provided the link.
Yeah, geez. The only good part about threads like this is that you can make fun of both sides. If people start being reasonable then it’s just going to wind up being a boring conversation about whatever point the OP was trying to make.
Well what the fuck do you want me to do? I can’t exactly go back and edit that shit. I had no idea someone was going to start crying, but to anyone who weeps in misery over some imagined gay-bashing slight… sorry
I do believe that was the most moving apology I’ve ever seen on the Straight Dope. I truly think I may cry. Otto, be a dear and fetch me a tissue, won’t you? I’ll try to hang on until you get back…
But the insult, “…fucking asshole cocksucking cuntmunchers. Fuckwads.”, was not directed at a person, it was directed at all Americans; apparently on the behalf of the person who ruined a TV show for you. I’m just curious at your wording, as I would have said something like “…inconsiderate, unthinking, culturally imperialistic, 24 spoiling turdburglars.” May I gently suggest you read some of Jarbabyj’s pit threads for instruction on creative invective?