The Big Bang Theory 5/5--The Wildebeest Implementation

Raj attempts to cure his social anxiety disorder while Penny uses Bernadette to spy on Leonard and his girlfriend.

Sounds like a well balanced episode, with all the characters getting plenty of airtime.

I’m glad they are going to try and address that - I thought the joke was getting old and holding some things back.

They’ve basically given up on the joke, already. To watch Raj in any coed group setting in recent episodes is to conclude that he’s a high-functioning borderline alcoholic.

I really think that Raj should at least reach the point at which he can talk to Penny normally – y’know, without the use of libations.

Yikes, saw a preview for BBT. Raj in tighty whities. shudder

It could be funny if Raj managed to substitute some other behavior in place of drinking to talk to ladies. Something like speaking in rhyme or only talking with his eyes closed.

Ridiculous.

For a mission like that, Penny would have to ask Amy Farrah Fowler. She’d know how to use much better surveilance gizmos, and it would help cement their relationship as besties.

Wow, that medicine really works!

Didn’t see that coming.

And I think Penny has terrible taste in shoes.

I was pretty close. The only thing I forgot was the opportunity for concealment provided by Beradette’s ample bosom.

Turn in your man-card: Forgetting anything about Bernadette’s ample bosom is grounds for banishment. :smiley:

I thought this episode was weak, not nearly as funny as last week.

I think there are too many characters each week. Howard and Raj barely spoke last week and Howard didn’t speak much this week.

And Raj in tighty whities was worse (much worse) than I could ever have imagined. I think it could have been a much better scene without the “shock and awe” aspect.

I bow to no man in my appreciation of the bosom in question. I just wasn’t thinking of it in terms of the paraphernalia of spycraft.

“But…you haven’t seen my penis yet!” I just about died laughing.

At the risk of revealing myself to be slightly denser than neutronium, can somebody explain the vanity card to me? I’ve read it repeatedly and just don’t get it. Why are the first two sentences an example of passive-aggressive behavior?

I’ve been studying up on the psychological phenomenon known as projection. Sigmund Freud explained it as the mental mechanism by which a person attributes to others the very qualities he or she despises, and cannot confront, in themselves. I’ve also been learning about passive-aggressive behavior. This is language and actions that are abusive but cleverly hidden behind a thin veil of civility. For example, the first two sentences of this vanity card.

Is he saying that projection itself constitutes passive-aggressive behavior, or that he (Chuck Lorre) is engaging in passive-aggressive behavior by the act of communicating those two sentences? If it’s the latter, why?

The first two sentences are directed at someone. He’s using his vanity card to take a passive-aggressive shot at someone (sending the message that whatever problem they have is just projection of their own despired qualities), then using the last half of the card to be self-referential in a humorous way.

I think. It’s also possible he was just stoned.

Because he’s still talking passive-aggressively about Charlie Sheen, when he knows he should be over it already.

Probably Charlie Sheen. He’s passive-aggressively taking a shot at Sheen, suggesting all the crap he’s said about Lorre is just projection. (The ‘real name’ thing, particularly, feels that way, since Sheen’s real name is Carlos, and Lorre’s is…Charles. Neither of them uses their real last name, though.)

:smack:

“I’d rather get a protate exam by a leaper who walks away with nine fingers.”

I suspect this line came from an unshot episode of 2 1/2 Men. I can just hear Charlie saying it.

And I hope I get a chance to use it in the near future (chaning it to a gynecological exam, of course).

And “gynecological” you spell correctly. :stuck_out_tongue: