The rally was on June 20. Symptoms can start within 48 hours. And according to the CNN article he’d had cancer and that would make him more likely to have more severe complications from COVID.
How many others has Cain infected, since it appears he was obeying Trump and not wearing a mask?
Cain posted a photo of himself at the Tulsa rally, seated among other attendees without a facial covering.
Paris Dennard, pictured smiling right behind Cain in the picture on Cain’s Twitter page from the rally, told CNN he has not been informed about Cain’s positive diagnosis or his hospitalization.
I doubt it. The only death that might make an impact is Trump. And I doubt that too because if he died of COVID I bet his team would lie and say he died of anything but COVID.
The right-wingers at my place of work are certain, CERTAIN that doctors are putting COVID-19 down as cause of death for things like heart attacks, because they somehow (mumble mumble) get more money from the government if they do so. So, apparently not.
After five years of this idiocy I’m still somehow amazed at the pretzels people will twist themselves into rather than simply admit the truth of a fact that disturbs their worldview.
“Other places were long before us, and they’re now, it’s a life, it’s got a life, and we’re putting out that life, 'cause that’s a bad life that we’re talking about.”
Not only ^this, but: somehow Trump is still being seen by these deep thinkers as ‘not the government.’ Somehow they give him a complete pass for being responsible for what ‘the government’ does.
It has to be some sort of psychological-identification phenomenon: these people want to be adored toddlers who can do anything (ANYthing!!!) and be forgiven, so they award Trump the status they crave for themselves, and simultaneously identify with him.
What else would account for such abandonment of all common-sense notions of personal responsibility?
Not to mention, since when does “the government” pay doctors for writing down a particular cause of death in the first place? How does that even work?
It’s like the saying goes: they’re not even wrong.
When they come at me with this crap (and they always do, they seem to have decided it’s their personal mission to inform me of every single crackpot thing they hear), I just nod and grunt ambiguously. One good thing about all this mask-wearing: no one can see your facial expression.
There is a 20% surplus charge so that treating a patient with Covid pays 20% more than treating a patient with pneumonia, for example.This was started as part of the Coronovirus Relief Act and presumably compensates hospitals for the fact that Covid-19 patients have longer, more complicated courses with extensive ICU stays. (Remember that hospitals are paid a set amount by Medicare for a patient with a certain diagnosis. For example, they get X dollars for a patient with a heart attack and Y dollars for a patient with pneumonia. This is apparently to encourage efficiency and prevent hospitals from just keeping patients and doing multiple tests as was happening when they were paid fee for service. The surplus for Covid-19 also helps to make up for extra costs for PPE, etc. Theoretically, then, the hospital could make money by listing any patient with pneumonia, heart attack or stroke as having probable Covid-19 in order to get the extra money. Frankly, I think that there are some hospitals who might do this, but most likely would not).
"Gustafson, in a memo to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross released by her office late Wednesday, said the department was using “amorphous and generalized” claims to try to exclude publication of certain material in the report.
“The final publication of our evaluation has been delayed, thwarted, and effectively (stopped) by the Department’s refusal to identify specific areas of privilege,” wrote Gustafson, who was appointed by President Barack Obama."
Ms. Gustafson has now vaulted into the lead for the, **“Next Inspector General to be Removed” (NIGR) sweepstakes. Her remarks on, “Sharpiegate” have her the odds on favorite at Vegas sportsbooks. President Dumpster-Fire is expected to poop/tweet on this, “nasty woman’s” future if he can be reached (around) by LG over the long holiday golf weekend.
“Other places were long before us, and they’re now, it’s a life, it’s got a life, and we’re putting out that life, 'cause that’s a bad life that we’re talking about.”
“Campaign literature made little mention of the real purpose of the referendum, framing it as a return to old-fashioned family values, designed to appeal to conservative voters…The brochure spelled out a range of amendments, including a provision that defines marriage strictly as a “union of a man and a woman.””