beatle:
If you turn to page one of this thread (my presumption; I am browsing with Netscape Navigator, your mileage may vary, debending upon your browser, the version and the speed of your Internet connection ;), ANYWAY, on October 6,1999, krish posted some links which evidently were intended to give newcomers such as myself (and possibly you) some historical context on the postings of bjOrn, which would allow us to come to our own conclusions as to whether he’s a troll.
I have taken it upon myself to read these four links, and the two links that inspired Papabear to go off on Thorleifur (sp?) I can’t remember who provided those links, and I’m not feeling inclined to go looking for them right now, but it could have been Papabear himself). As a result, I’m still on the 'net at 0130 local time, and I’m likely to be late for work in the morning. Don’t anyone feel guilty; I chose this course of action for the evening.
Krish, I must confess that link #3, originated by Frankd6, confuses me a bit. While bjOrn did post to the thread a couple of times, he is by no means overly represented. I found link #2 to be hilarious, and I applaud all of those who contributed to it with non-English language replies, including those who used pig latin. The bit in Elvish was priceless. Fukk marks to bjOrn foe originating it.
On the whole, my impression of Thorleifur is as follows: He has been acculturated to regard the actions of American foreign policy with suspicion, his OP’s tend to challenge Americans to justify the dichotomy between the advertised ideals of The American Way and the realities of life on the ground in the U.S.A. (a habit many Americans might do well to take up), and when he is given a straight answer, respectfully worded and with a minimum of jingoism, he tends to accept it and respectfully disavow any intent to insult.
I have the same impression of Hoe.
Both of these individuals do, in my view, seem to respond to jingoism with a certain level of disdain which propably informs their ri**post[/]es (and if I did that right, I apologize for the horrible pun) with a certain amount of prickliness.
bjOrn, in addition to these qualities, has, in my view, demonstrated a devastating level of wit comparable to the best of Monty Python and the Black Adder, and surrealism on a level with Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern are Dead.
Of course, I’ve been mixing Kahlua, brandy and milk all night, so feel free to take that into account.
Lynn, would you be so good as to provide us with a definition of the term troll? If you prefer, you may defer to kellibelli as the originator of this thread. I ask because having seen Palidors listed as a troll, I am confused as to the inclusion of bjOrn on the same list.
Maype I should just stick to smart-ass remarks.