billfish and I were joking around, all in good fun. Your comment was meant to do what exactly? And what did it contribute to the conversation? Reminder, this weighty intellectual contribution, in a conversation about the ethics of vegetarianism, was: "MMMMMmmmm veal… "
And, as I’ve said once or thrice before, mhendo’s the one who started calling names. In fact, I’m pretty sure the only one here who’s called anyone a wordy dird has been the veggums.
Would it have made a difference If I said “HEY! I like veal”?
I’d rather someone say “fuck you” to me than tell me that I was a pretentious, disingenuous person who is living a fraudulent, weird, unnatural lifestyle. DtC was the most insulting person in this thread by a country mile, swear words notwithstanding.
What would the relevance of that be in this thread? Why post it?
Dry frying also works well.
He said vegetarianism is fraudulent. I’m a vegetarian. What other conclusion would you draw?
Wow, you really are a little bit stupid aren’t you?
Except that the two things are not the same.
Diogenes said that vegetarianism is fraudulent. Period. He never said it would be fraudulent for him, or for certain people only. He said it is a fraudulent lifestyle.
I said that i have some ethical problems with the production of meat and the way animals are raised, and that is why i don’t eat meat. But i don’t think that the actual eating of meat is unethical, for the reasons i outlined. There are too many variables in why people eat meat, and the economic and social pressures under which they choose their diets, to make such a blanket statement.
If you can’t grasp that, you’re even stupider than you appear.
I find it interesting, in a thread about the alleged intolerance of vegetarians, that you and a few others keep insisting that i must believe that meat eaters are unethical. Here i am, making very clear that i don’t believe that, and yet you insist on attributing to me a position of intolerance that i do not hold.
Believe me, if i feel that someone is unethical, i have no problems calling them unethical. I think you’re a fucking retarded moron, and i have no trouble calling you that; if i thought that eating meat made you unethical, why would i hold back?
I neither expect nor want pity.
I’m happy to admit to the mudslinging; the only thing i dispute is that what Diogenes said was not an insult. It clearly was, and only someone with fewer than a half-dozen functioning neurons would think otherwise. I guess you qualify on that score. That’s fine; i can handle the insults because i give as good as i get.
As for your continued whining about how vegetarians have been the ones calling names, so fucking what? I’ve called people names who have acted like assholes and stupid fucktards. It has nothing to do with whether or not they eat meat; it has to do with their obtuse idiocy and the insults they were throwing.
So kindly go fuck yourself.
Bullshit. DtC did not say one thing that could possibly be insulting to anyone.
Get off your fucking high horse.
Be honest. I’m not a douchbag because you think I’m thread shitting. I’m a douchbag because I like meat. Right?
DtC’s first post in this thread was assholish.
I have never encountered you before, but you’re acting like a douche here.
It seemed like we’d all pretty much kissed and made up right about the time we started talking about Ethiopian food, Thai food, tofu, and so on. But, evidently, there’s still plenty of dumbass comments to go around. Jesus, people, let it fucking go.
As a non-vegetarian with no dog in this fight, you’re a douchebag regardless of your eating habits.
Either you can’t read or you’re being disingenuous. I wonder how you’d take it if I said that your lifestyle was weird, unnatural, and fraudulent. I suspect no one likes being spoken of that way.
I’m married to a meat eater and I don’t think he’s a douchebag. We never fight about food issues. No, I really do think you’re a douchebag because you’re thread shitting and you know it. Just admit it and move on.
Shit! I spelled douchebag wrong.
Here’s an explanation that might be simple enough even for stupidaaron to absorb and understand:
Consumers of all sorts of goods and services often provide financial support for behaviors and practices that some people consider unethical.
Those who buy shoes made in SE Asian sweatshops fill the coffers of those who employ people under poor conditions for awful wages. Those who buy drugs end up giving their money to cartels that are responsible for murder and extortion. Those who use prostitutes might have their money end up in the hands of a pimp who beats his prostitutes. Those who buy Coors beer provide more money to a bunch of asshole conservatives. And those who eat meat often end up supporting an industry that does (what i believe are) unethical things.
But that does not mean that any of those acts—buying shoes, smoking weed, using a prostitute, drinking Coors, or eating meat—are unethical activities, in and of themselves. The blame for the unethical activity lies further up the chain, and while the millions of individual consumers might help facilitate it, their purchasing decisions are not unethical, and each consumer has such a small impact that this is the wrong place to lay any blame for unethical conduct.
Basically, i don’t believe that the housewife buying chicken pieces for family dinner, or the college student picking up steaks for a barbecue, is ethically responsible for the chain of problematic practices and processes that bring that meat into the supermarket.
If i believed that the simple act of killing and eating an animal, under any circumstances, were unethical, then i might believe that all meat-eaters are unethical. But i don’t, so i don’t. Simple.
are you talking douchegans or doucheies?
Cause the doucheies are cool …the douchegans are stuck up, let me tell you 
Damn dude, you just described my perfect weekend
Speaking as someone who would eat veal every god-damned day if he could afford it, you have to be a very special kind of stupid to read Diogenes’ post and not see how it’s insulting to vegetarians.
I did not insult anybody. You guys are way too sensitive. If the problem is the word “fradulent,” I only meant that it’s ethically futile. It’s difficult to impossible for people in the devloped world to live without killing animals. I don’t know why anybody would find that observation personally insulting, or even debatable.
…
That was hardly what you said, or what you meant.
At this point, I’ll go to bed, and leave you to the sharp pointed teeth of the hunters of cabbage.
With any luck, by the time I wake up tomorrow, you’ll have some idea, or, at least, a clue.
Forget it, Jake. It’s Diogenes.