What's it like to have sex as/with an obese human?

I am not an obese person, nor have I ever had intercourse with one (not of a sexual kind, at any rate). And that kind of thing certainly isn’t my “kink.”

But I’ve chanced upon pr0n (still pics, not videos, thank god, although sometimes there is some chunk in there, you know, full-figured), and it raises my curiosity to a degree. Not so much how the whole thing would look, but how it would feel socially and emotionally. OK, physically too (the whole “the more cushion” thing).

So, are you obese (the more obese, the better)? If so, have you ever had sex? How did/does the obesity affect the whole deal?

Are you not obese but with experience in the sexual side of, you know, have you ever done one? Was it a case of “beer goggles,” “settling,” “kink,” or “none of the above”? What was your observation of the experience?

Please try not to be too graphic, but be descriptive, as there are plenty of prudes on the board (not that I have to tell you).

Thank you.

I’m going to jump in here - absolutely immediately - to note that the warning flag is up. Please keep your responses appropriate for IMHO, or find a different forum.

Well, I’ve been heavy (300+ pounds at 5 feet 6, wearing a size 24-26) and I’ve been “normal” (165, wearing a size 12-14), never been slender. I’ve had partners who were thin, average, and heavier than me.

I’ll try to respond to your questions without getting prickly about the implication that sex with a “obese” person is somehow in a different category from “normal” sex. I felt an undercurrent there, but I’m hoping none was intended.

The biggest contrast (to generalize greatly), is that when I’m fitter with a fitter partner, the sex tends to be more atheletic, more energetic, and more rapidly diverse in terms of changing positions. When either partner is significantly heavy, the sex has tended to be more leisurely, with changing positions a more thoughtful and sometimes cumbersome process. “Heavy” sex tended to involve more foreplay, manual and oral stimulation, and less “banging away” penis-in-vagina time. Heavy sex tended to be more comfortble, less hurried. I felt more valued as an individual and less as an object (meaning an objectively sexy person outside of the relationship).

I’ve also found that the heavier partner tended to initiate sex more often–needing reassurance that they are sexy. I realize that the common assumption is that women tend to feel unattractive when heavy and so avoid sex. It never worked that way for me. Sex helped me feel desirable and I liked that. Of course, I didn’t stick with any partner who found me unattractive.

I’ve never had any trouble getting the “naughty bits” together, even with two of us well over 250. I would say that there is usually a tendency to be shy about nudity in the early stages of a sexual relationship where one of more partner is heavy. When I was heavy I tended to want to “cover up more” or wear sexy garments rather than having naked sex. I liked to have my breasts supported.

I guess I’ve always been puzzled by people who find sexual pleasure to be related to the “societally defined” attractiveness of their partner. Perhaps my attitude is unusual. I’ve never sought sexual partners for their “objective” attractiveness, but rather because I enjoyed their company. The sex wasn’t better because he had a handsome face and good muscular back. The sex was better because of his responsiveness, his attention to my needs, our mutual chemistry, an adventurous spirit, a sense of humor, etc.

So much depends on the mental attitudes of the participants. A heavy woman or man with “presence” is as sexy (in my opinion) as a more fit individual. I’ve felt incredibly attractive and remarkably sexy at my heaviest, and felt criticized and unattractive (and therefore un-sexy) at my fittest. No matter how heavy I’ve been, I’ve always found ways to “put on my sexy persona,” dress attractively, and walk into a room with the attitude that “I am sexy and any man here would be lucky to have me.” Seems to work like a charm.

I hope that’s a start. Sex is fun and fullfilling at all sizes (IMHO).

Well, I’m on the smallish side, but I’ve dated guys of various sizes.

The biggest guy I dated was 6’2" and weighed about 230 so he was a bit chunky. The only thing I noticed different about him is that he would sweat like a mo-fo. I never knew if that was because he was just a sweaty guy, if it was because he wasn’t very fit.

Also, he snored worse than any one else I ever dated - he did have the extra weight around his throat that is some times associated with sleep apnea and I always wondered if he lost some weight or did more exercise if he would snore less.

FWIW - he wasn’t the least fit person I’ve ever dated - that was a different guy and sex with him was…dull. IMHO it’s better if your partner is at least as fit as you are.

I found it somewhat offensive, but if you don’t, I won’t worry about it.

I will echo much of what as-u-wish has said. One of the greatest revelations of my life was to be in a relationship with someone who found my zaftig curves his ideal of sexiness. (And he is a slightly-built guy – 5’ 8", maybe 140 lbs. And his body type is MY ideal of sexiness. Go figure.)

When it comes to sex with a heavy-set partner, give me the squishy, teddy-bear kind of guy. The round, unyielding beer belly is, for me, more difficult, because I like full-body contact.

Seems pretty clear that you find the idea disturbing. Seems pretty shallow to me.

Excessive body fat to the point of obesity is not healthy or attractive in a biological sense. Maybe the OP could have worded it more gently (or better yet - I’m not sure why he/she felt compelled to ask the question in the first place) but I don’t think the lack of attraction can fairly be called shallow.

Thanks, all. I am getting some good information here.

BTW, I don’t think there is anything “shallow” about personal preferences, is there?

I don’t know what you consider obese, but I’m about 220 lbs and 5’ 8" and have sex with guys who were as big as or bigger than I am. I’ve also had sex with short guys, tall guys, skinny guys, long-haired and bald guys, so although there are certain physical traits I find attractive, when push comes to shove I don’t give a hoot what he looks like, as long as I like him.

Wait, what was the question again? Oh, right, sex. Yeah, I’ve had problems a few times with things popping out during face-to-face, but I’m not sure if that’s bellies getting in the way or just the angle of attack I like or just something that happens to everyone. I definitely like the feel of softer guys, with at least a little layer of fat. The one really athletic guy I slept with I didn’t like - all hard corners and angles, not soft and cuddly enough. There are so many differences between one person and another, I really can’t draw any generalizations.

Oh, about the sweating thing? I’ve been with two guys who sweated a lot during sex. Both were overweight, but I’ve been with plenty more overweight guys who didn’t sweat much, so I think it was just the way their bodies worked.

I don’t think so. I’m fat, and I realize that some people won’t be attracted to me as a result of that. That’s okay, I have particular sexual tastes that a lot of other people don’t share, too. I think it would be shallow to decide whether or not you like someone based on appearances, or to let outside influences affect what kind of person you’re attracted to. People shouldn’t feel obligated to be attracted to the kind of people that cultural norms or political correctness tell them to.

Then 99.9% of men are shallow, I guess. Men want to bang heat, though their definition of heat may vary.

I’ve never known a single guy, straight or gay, who did not feel that good looks were a necessary condition of attraction. C’est la biologie.

I think(?) Shoshana was expressing distaste over Aeschines’ assertion that another person who finds attractive or has sex with an obese person must have “beer goggles,” be “settling,” or have a “kink”.

I totally respect that Aeschines does not find obese people attractive. It was his implication that anyone who finds them attractive is probably either drunk, desperate, or a pervert that was shallow…and slightly off-putting.

I believe, technically, obesity is defined as having a BMI over 30. In any case, this can be misleading. There are situations (infrequently, I’ll grant you) where body type and muscle mass will lead to a BMI over 30 without the classic look of an “obese” person. So I suppose he would need to identify his definition of obese.

Obese can mean the 400+ lb, almost perfectly spherical, jiggling mound of flesh.
Obese can also be identified as a short, size 12 woman with DDD breasts. ( a 5’2" woman weighing only 165 lbs is also considered obese with a BMI of 30)…

So do you mean technically obese…or are you thinking more along the lines of morbidly obese (BMI over 40)?

I’ll go ahead and defend the OP. There are many different categories of people and presumably sex with each kind is different. He (or she?) is merely asking what sets having sex with this particular category apart from, say, sex with midgets or hairy people or the incredibly skinny. I at least didn’t read it to be presuming that obese sex is somehow worse than “normal” sex, just different.

My own experience, while I’ve never been obese, is that when I was overweight sex was slightly (only slightly) more frustrating, as I’d get cramps in weird positions and wear out earlier than I would have liked. I also felt like I wasn’t as attractive as I would have liked to be. Maybe I’m saying too much (I can’t say I’ve ever answered a sex question in this forum), but for me a significant part of the thrill of sex is making the lady feel as great as possible. When I feel ugly and I’m always short of breath, that can definitely take away from the experience. Your mileage may vary, as they say.

[QUOTE=Aeschines]
want to bang heat, though their definition of heat may vary.
QUOTE]
“Heat”? I don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.
I want to “bang” a woman that I’m in love with.

Well said as_u_wish. I’ve been obese and not obese. The biggest (no pun intended) is the ability to move. When I’m large, I’m not able to move positions easily which can be bothersome. Otherwise, the look of love in my partner’s eyes is all the turn-on I need to feel sexy and wanted. Perhaps it’s a male/femle difference, but I’ve never been compelled to “bang heat”.

What I mean is pretty damn fat. Speaking as a hetero guy, I think most dudes start to shy away from fatness levels when there is an outward bulge in the gut and the chick has that, you know, that fat face. “Fleshiness” may or may not be attractive. Hugeness isn’t usually. Most men do not measure BMI before a bang, so I don’t think that statistic matters much.

Oh, fer heaven’s sakes. I didn’t say it would be shallow to decide whether or not you’re attracted to someone based on appearance, I said it would be shallow to decide whether or not you like that person. As in, think they’re a good person. In fact, I pretty explicity gave carte blanche to anyone who’s not attracted to anyone else based on any aspect of their physical appearance. In general, I’m attracted to people I like, and not attracted to people I don’t like.

But you wouldn’t be in love with her if you didn’t find her bangable. Which means hot.

And I’m pretty much never attracted to guys who talk like frat boys.