The segment was not any implied size at all, it was simply mentioned. And it would be great if you managed to keep the debate in mind instead of sliding off the road so egregiously. You’re accusing me of behaviour only you can see, and you haven’t yet demonstrated that I have said a single objectionable thing.
I didn’t mean all women, as a simple reading without prejudice will show. I have no idea what you mean by the second and third sentences quoted above. However, you will note that the phenomenon I discussed earlier (and one of the reasons why prostitutes and hostesses made it into the discussion) was the crudely called “yellow fever” many men exhibit when they come to Asia. Which of course has to do with the OP.
Why, apart from convenient misrepresentation, do you portray me as saying that “the ‘first thing’ that some asian women do consider westerners to be more desirable targets”? Apart from the basic incomprehensibility of your argument, do you know what you are discussing? If by your own admission you don’t know about prostitutes and hostesses, why do you insist on this foolish and unnecessary strategy of equivocation?
What are you saying in the above quoted paragraph? Is there a point? Why are you surprised that I should mention local prostitutes, hostesses, and even Western prostitutes? And are you able to actually discuss some of the material here? For example, can you actually challenge any of my claims instead of airing your indignance?
The comparison is all in your head. However there is nothing “weird” about the juxtaposition of the two, especially when they converge so (relatively) frequently.
You fail to understand my approach: if I mentioned prostitution and whatnot when you didn’t, it is simply to explain and support a point, hopefully beyond the understanding you have displayed so far.
There is of course no need to quote everything I posted, however you ought to take my argument as a whole rather than complain about certain portions of it that, had you read without knee-jerk, you would have understood the first or even second time round. And, I am sure, you wouldn’t have had issues with.
So perhaps you would like to address the argument at long last? So far you have only complained without much cause, referring to vague accusations of racism and stereotype. You mention my cautionary notes as if I am making some racist points and trying to cover my back. I am rapidly losing patience with that tack of your argument, especially because it is so poorly supported.
First, don’t imply “all” I am interested in is prostitutes when the argument you have been presented wth is obviously a good deal wider than your field of vision.
Secondly, it’s obvious you have very little inkling of what implications really are or are not contained in my post, or indeed in this entire thread. Hopefully I clarified what gaggle and kreg stated so poorly, though I doubt you will be convinced of anything until you have swallowed an entirely PC version of reality that conforms to your sensitivites. Unfortunately the world doesn’t usually work like that. Stereotypes and preconceptions may be the basis of a relationship as easily as honest love.
