Women find male genitals replusive, and most men don't even know it

I’ll reiterate, a homeless man will NEVER have sex with any woman, regardless of whether she’s homeless or not.
On the other hand a homeless women can still choose the guy who can have sex with her; it’s likely if he buys her a McDonald’s and lets her stay at his pad for a few days then she’ll give him sex in return.

I don’t hate wieners. I have one. I’m simply stating a biological fact that most men refuse to acknowledge cause it hurts their ego.
I noticed the guys still avoid mentioning the last part, the one about women laughing and cheering with jubilance when a man’s penis is cut off by a woman. I wonder why? The truth could be too uncomfortable for them to take in.

I really don’t know, nor am I aware of, any woman who would joyfully cheer when a man’s penis is cut off.

What the hell kind of women do you hang around with?

ETA: May I ask where you are from, both physically and culturally?

Those women must have been battered, or sexual assault victims, and/or the man was a convicted rapist or pedophile or it was staged, those are the only reasons why something like that could happen. Are we all to believe that women are all part of some secret cabal that despises dicks unless sucking on one gets them something? C’mon man. Get real.

In the case of the homeless woman situation, a situation like that relies on two people, a man who is sick enough to take advantage and a woman willing to give it up for McDonalds and a bed. In every other nominal example, this is not true. Sure, a woman could use sex to get what she wants as per the stereotype, and sometimes it may be commonplace, but I am saying, it is INCORRECT as well as UNFAIR to say ALL women have a proclivity for that. Just like it is absolutely INCORRECT to say all women would laugh at a man being castrated or what have you. Do you have access to some secret behind the scenes knowledge that nobody else does? Because that is how it seems you are floating your argument.

Aha! Finally! Let’s get down to business.
The only reason you’ve never seen or knows women’s reactions to cutting off penises is because you’ve never bothered to see them.

Here’s one getting a standing ovation from a random large audience of females:


Here’s one where the whole female audience laughs and cheers with the female hosts:

Here’s some random disqus comments:
http://crimefeed.com/2015/01/man-beats-wife/

Here’s some random facebook comments:

And note the women in the audience were not screened beforehand. They were not asked: “Do you find cutting off penises awesome and hilarious? Yes? Ok you can come in. No? You have to leave.” That didn’t happen. The female crowds are random.

So what does this have to do with the debate? My point was if a man had been maimed in any other way, like say he was facially disfigured for any reason, most women would condemn it. But ONLY when it’s this particular part of the male anatomy she cuts off, there’s cheers and joy among all womankind. She becomes a heroine. Women can’t help but to exclaim how “awesome” it is to cut off the penis. This is clear evidence of women’s utter disgust towards this part of the male body. If you don’t think so I don’t know what else to tell you.

Typical blame the victim mentality. "Women can never do wrong, the man must have deserved it for some reason. Though I’ll add women only use these arguments when it’s his genitals that are maimed, not if it’s another body part.
Also I’ll add almost all cases of penis cutting are due to either the man cheated, or wanted to break-up/divorce, or he had a verbal argument with the woman.

Not sure of the exact number, but close to 3.5-4 BILLION women in the entire world? You want us all to believe because of some sick crap you found online, that the majority, lets say 2.5 BILLION women, would like watching that and cheer? Yes? Please tell me how you know this outside of what you’ve seen in your collection of phenomenal internet finds.
EDIT: Highlight one of the links and read it. One of them says “Man-Beats-Wife” thus further illustrating my point.

You know what? I’m done here.

Good luck to you sir, I hope you find whatever it is you’re looking for.

It’s called SAMPLING!

And the guy beat his wife after she cut off his penis twice. Not to say punching someone is the equivalent of castration. Though in the mind of a woman it is, cause that part of the male body is so disgusting to them, they believe any slightest upset of a woman’s feelings justifies its maiming. This basically sums women up: “What’s the big deal? All that fuss over that icky thing between his legs?”

The women on those YouTube clips are fucked up people. I don’t how anyone can find that even remotely funny, or seem to worship Lorena Bobbitt. What the fuck?

It’s called CHERRY PICKING. Based on your “methodology” I can cherry pick evidence for the existence of Big Foot and ghosts.

Again, anecdote =/= data.

Have you ever studied critical thinking, statistics or logic? If so, did you learn anything?

You are wrong

Has anyone considered the (undoubtedly remote) possibility that the OP’s junk actually is disgusting, and that’s why he’s having problems?

Just to correct you here.

Talk show audiences are in fact often selected and solicited by controversial subject matter and always primed before the filming for the reaction that the show wants them to have. They are instructed whether to cheer or boo and to laugh at jokes that are not funny. These are not random reactions and your thinking they are is amazingly naive.
In any case you are conflating a distorted power dynamic with normal attraction/repulsion. No question in my mind that there are going to be some women who would see penis amputation as just punishment for an abusive male much more so than cutting off his hand or putting him in jail or even death.
As far as normal attraction/repulsion goes … my impression is that women in general have less of a reaction of arousal to the image of an penis isolated from context than a man might have to any variety of similarly private female parts. For some, isolated of the right context a penis showing up might be considered threatening, not potentially arousing.

So far as the point might be that in general women’s arousal is less based on a single body part alone, or even on the physical alone, than the in general men’s arousal is, sure.

Genitalia as an attractive body part? I doubt many of either gender see them as all that “attractive” per se out of context. Ask a thousand men what the most attractive body part on a woman is and you might get lots of answers of “breasts”, “ass”, “legs”, “eyes”, “mouth”, … or even “mind” … but “vulva”? … Show us the board! Bzzz.
Your belief that women only engage in sex as part of an exchange for protection (be it economic or emotional protection) and do such overcoming disgust and revulsion with the male body part involved in the process at best reflects some very bad experiences you have had.

Sorry that such has been your fate.
But yes if are an otherwise unattractive person as a complete package then most women will be disgusted by seeing your junk (and sure relatively more men could see a woman as otherwise unattractive as complete package, as a superficial and selfish individual, but still like seeing a particular body part of hers)

That was my very first thought.

Dude, half of college students ARE women. The 19th century called, they* don’t* want you back.

I think it’s more likely the person the junk is attached to. Plenty of women can overlook physical ugly, inner ugly not so much.

I don’t think you’re going to trick anyone into googling “disgusting penis.”

I’ll skip anything that sounds stupid. There’s just too much stupid that can’t be avoided to voluntarily click for more.

One of the ongoing complaints with Loaves and Fishes in Sacramento (a free food distribution charity) is that the homeless folks waiting for them to open will screw in the doorways of nearby businesses. The businesses are seriously not amused. [edited to add - there’s a reason that homeless shelters are segregated]

If you say it three times, does that make it true?

There was a study done, maybe a decade back, about reasons that people have sex. Both men and women listed at least 40 reasons for having sex besides just wanting sex. That doesn’t mean that either men or women don’t enjoy sex; it just means that people are complex. And, to be plain, it also didn’t mean that anyone answering only or mainly had sex for one reason.

As a for instance, a guy who had sex with his girlfriend’s best friend because he was angry with his girlfriend was not doing it because of only that. It did not mean that he found sex or women’s organs disgusting.

Men find women’s breasts to be repulsive and women grossly underestimate just how repulsive men find this misshapen part of their anatomy. Without doubt, the most obvious example of this is when we hear of those high-profile cases where serial killers cut off their victims breasts. The vast majority of men erupt in ecstatic cheers and happiness regardless of their political stances. Need more proof? Google ‘breast removing serial killers’ yourself. The only reason you don’t know men’s reactions to breast mutilation is you haven’t looked. YouTube up some videos on “breast ironing” if you don’t believe me.

Well you see, the problem is there are no men who laugh at a woman being mutilated.
I also provided all the links in a comment on page 3.
And men are also very aroused by the female anatomy, unlike women.

I don’t see why you thought writing all that would be clever.

Hell I am not … I am looking at it, touching it, fondling it, tasting it … then after foreplay we can get down to the penetrative fun.

What can I say, our quickies tend to have around half an hour of foreplay with release for me. Non quickies can be all night with several bouts.

You need to either stop reading whatever you are getting your information from, or find some different women who haven’t been trained to shut their eyes and think of Jesus [or the Queen, or Allah or whatever.] The human body is a veritable playground when treated right.