I’d like to address something that I think may be somewhat of a contradiction. I’m not sure how best to phrase it, so bear with me.
A pattern that’s emerging here is that women want a man who is considerate; a man who isn’t rude or crude; a man who is polite and attentive and complimentary, above all, a man who does all this in general and it isn’t an act. You want to know the “real” guy.
Now, certainly, a guy on a first date should be all those things. I’d like to think I am as well and that it’s not an act…per se. I add that caveat because, you know what? Sometimes I’m crude. Sometimes I’m very crude. Sometimes I’ll talk about uninteresting topics (i.e. sports). Sometimes I’ll compliment someone because it seems polite to do so, not because deep in my heart I know it to be the God’s honest truth.
Where am I going with this? I have, or consider myself to have, a great deal of qualities on the “do” list. But there are a few “don’t” qualities that I have as well. Now, we’re talking about first dates and those “don’t” qualities won’t appear on the first date. Or, rather, I’ll try not to let them. But what does that mean? That means you’re not seeing the full me. You want a man who isn’t acting, but I’m telling you that I AM acting when I’m all nice all the time.
How do I say this succintly rather than ramble on and on for paragraphs? Too late. OK, the “don’t” qualities I have aren’t bad qualities. They’re just ones that are inappropriate for a first date. But you can’t ask me to be the real me while simultaneously expecting me to repress many of the things that makes me me! And the real me uses “me” 5 times in every sentence!
Gah. Does any of this make sense?
I’m not really upset by this contradiction, but I wanted to point out there is one.