Comparing Trump to Hitler is the equivalent of comparing Sanders to Stalin.
Well, does Sanders proposes to remove people like in Operation Wetback II?
That’s pretty funny and probably very accurate. However, not all unions or confederations are permanent or have peaceful mechanisms for withdrawal. I’m for a United States of Europe but I think the EU has serious problems that nations can have a legitimate beef with.
No, which is the point. Neither Sanders or Trump are proposing anything as truly evil as what Stalin or Hitler did.
When Trump starts to talk about marching Mexicans into ovens you’ll be making a fair comparison. Until then you’re just spewing out blind hatred of a politician you disagree with.
Actually several Mexicans died in the heat of the desert were the Original Plan sent them. Incidentally my point was that Trump is not as evil as Hitler, but that he does get a lot of ideas from neo fascists. The point once again is that the comparison is not imaginary as even Trump has produced evidence of what he thinks will make America “great” again.
In any case one can notice that you did not had any reply to what Trump tweeted.
Read the post of Wolfpup’s that I quoted and responded to. He compared Brexit and Trump to the Nazi’s. That’s idiotic. Nothing you’ve posted proves otherwise.
I did not had any reply to the tweet because I didn’t see it. If you’d like to post to it again I’ll be more than happy to share my thoughts.
“all have these same common factors: lies and the use of lies to exploit fear and disillusionment.” That as my history tells me describes the beginning of the fascist movements, not things like the Holocaust. Indeed, what happens next depends on what the people lets the fascists or neo fascists to get away with.
Well thank you for showing all that you are incapable of scrolling up. Or clicking on a link. 
In any case the evidence of what Trump is getting his ideas from is clear, it is only you the one that is denying what was posted already.
This is another example:
But Wolfpup didn’t mention “fascism”. He mentioned Germany in the 1930s. Context is important.
So you’re not going to link to the tweet? Aw shucks, and here I was all excited and such.
Indeed, the Nazis then were just getting started with lots of lies, what he mentioned what the rise to power of the Nazis, not what happened once they got it.
Two tweets already posted you twit.
So it’s cool to say Trump is starting out in a similar fashion to Hitler since nobody is going to jump from there to assume they’re going to end similarly as well.
Seems tone deaf to quote Mussolini, but beyond that I see nothing objectionable.
With the support of thugs like Joe Arpaio his lower ethnic cleansing is more doable.
What you are tone deaf about is that all this demonstrates that Trump does not come later to declare that his neo fascist sources are objectionable.
So you are going with the Hitler comparison? You need to pick a lane.
This isn’t comprehensible. Rephrase please.
Read it again, neo fascists know their limitations, they are clever enough to fool people like you.
Again, you are tone deaf when convenient, it is just like when Trump joins people like Joe Arpaio to the hip or cannot condemn KKK guys right away. The lack of any condemnation from Trump of the people that he re-tweeted (sometimes several times) can not be swept under the rug.
The longer it goes (his lack of condemnation or repudiation) it demonstrates that Trump seeks and wants the support of authoritarians that have very little interest in defending the rights of minorities or immigrants.
How about a yes or no answer? Are you comparing Trump to Hitler?
So yeah, I’ll reiterate. Quoting Mussolini doesn’t seem like an astute political move to me. That’s why I call it tone deaf.
But there’s nothing inherently objectionable to the semantic content of the tweet. It doesn’t advocate ethnic cleansing or anything else that one typically associates with Hitler. It simply states a preference for being a lion.
I don’t tweet, but I’ll respond with a quote of my own.
[QUOTE=George Orwell]
“The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable”
[/QUOTE]
Compareding him to a Neo Fascist will do.
Like I said, he can easily fool people like you.
Then Orwell makes the point that other words are also losing meaning: “The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice” Orwell did came against Stalin, but he was still against fascism and the fascists or others that twisted those words to minimize how anti democratic they were.
The only point here was that Fascism (but it is neo fascism, to be more precise) is something that can be pointed out as an item that Trump is not willing to condemn, and he is only happy to feed his and others authoritarian dreams.
Refuse to answer. Copy that.
So who are “people like me”?
As I’ve stated multiple times now, Wolfpup referenced Germany in the 1930s, not “neofascism”. Your insistence on not seeing that is baffling.
Bill Moyers can fool people like you.
Piffle, the reality is that many do know that you are the one being fooled here.
So, either he likes what people like Mussolini did or just panders to the crowds that likes it. Both options are reprehensible. And as we are talking in the thread about breaking unions apart, Trump then is looking more like President Buchanan than Pat Buchanan. (Who also has been pointed out as a lover of fascist ideas, and a big supporter of Trump.)
You don’t answer question nor are you able to make basic distinctions. Considering that, the fact we disagree is reassuring.
Since you ask, they could be described as right-wing morons but let’s just deal with you specifically. A right-wing moron and gun nut extraordinaire who trolls the SDMB with idiotic right-wing bloviations apparently memorized from the bumper stickers of rural Texas pickups, declares the Washington Post a “liberal rag”, somehow manages to combine homophobia with anti-abortionism in one asinine topic, and appears to be an all-around pigbrained fuckwit. I can clarify further if you like but that’s the general idea.