That could work. Still really contrived though.
And what’s he doing living in Charlie’s house without Charlie being there? They’d have to live in a different house, but the house is one of the strongest characters on the show!
I’d buy him as a step-brother, but not as Evelyn’s child.
However they explain Charlie’s absence, I’ll bet it doesn’t make him look good. Lorre could take the high road, but I doubt if he will.
Maybe they’ll say Charles went off to lead Al Qaeda. I hear there’s a vacancy at the top.
Really? You had to go there? Even snark should be just a little bit credible!
Then again, maybe you’re right. Most virile and confident young men would have too much pride and self-respect to marry…ewwww!..Demi Moore! :rolleyes:
A Very Special Episode, for sure. It’s established that Charlie has an interest in auto-erotic asphyxiation, being concerned about whether the shower in a Vegas hotel will support the weight of a grown man… seems a fairly natural way out for him.
Or, Alan on the phone at the beginning of the episode:
“Yes. I see. With a rock? I don’t understand – seven grams doesn’t sound big enough to do much damage.” [Jake rolls eyes]
I don’t watch the show, but I like Kutcher and think it could work with good writing.
What’s ironic to me is the last time Ashton was involved with a show it was when he left it…it wasn’t quite the end of That 70’s Show, but it was definitely the beginning of the end. Now here he comes to save another show? Guess we’ll see how it goes.
I’m surprised he’s doing it, as he seems to star in a couple of movies each year. But I read that he’s being paid a million per episode (and that’s higher than most others would have gotten), so I guess twenty million a year was hard to turn down. (Supposedly, Charlie Sheen was paid two million per episode, so this is cheaper for them.) And perhaps he can still star in movies when the show is not in production.
I never liked Matt LeBlanc on Friends but he was surprisingly good on Showtime’s Extras playing an alterniverse version of himself (i.e. his character is former FRIENDS star Matt LeBlanc but he’s an over the top Hollywood horndog and user- not unlike Sheen’s character on 2.5 M except famous). He actually might have worked well as Sheen 2.
How hard is it for Sheen to act like himself? Seriously. He plays a smarmy womanizer who fell ass backwards into money on little talent.
If it wasn’t for the writers behind the show we would end up with the Torpedoed Career of Truth that is Charlie Sheen’s life (coming to a city near you).
Seriously? This is a spectacularly naive question.
If the producers REALLY hate Sheen they’ll kill him off.
I think they can find someone better. I’m not one of those who think the show will necessarily die without Charlie. The writers can still make the show work with the remaining cast and another actor that Alan (Jon Cryer) can work off of.
Am I describing his life or his character on the show:
He’s a rich over-the-hill Hollywood playboy who uses money to get women of which he cannot get enough of.
That doesn’t really figure into performance, though.
It’s true that the role isn’t anything like a stretch for him, but it’s silly to think that performance (especially comedic performance) comes naturally or easily when a character is clearly modeled on the actor. The answer to the question “How hard can it be?” is “Hard. Damned hard.” Unless you happen to have some talent – and Charlie Sheen has that in spades, in spite of what a douchebag he happens to be.
I think they’ve made something of logical error and decided: “Hey, Ashton Kutcher’s a douchebag – let’s get him!”
Charlie Sheen’s special talent is his last name. I can go into any theater in the United States and grab a replacement for Sheen and do better. The reverse cannot be said. The only reason Ashton Kutcher was picked is because they needed a name to draw people back in.
He fell backwards into money because of his father and without writers he’s a one-man career demolition team.
I don’t like the show, I don’t like Charlie Sheen, and I don’t like Ashton Kutcher. So I voted Other.
I don’t get what’s so special about Sheen. Surely they could find someone else to act like a working drunk who delivers cheesy sarcastic one liners and put-downs just about anywhere. Ashton Kutcher will do as well as anyone else. I think they should focus more on the son though.
some dude?? is that a clever joke?
I think the show is pretty funny but I assume that’s the writing. I doubt they’ll have Kutcher play Charlie’s character so they’ll have to come up with some angle. Maybe Charlie’s character will be working in NYC indefinitely and his brother and Ashton’s character wind up living there.
In a sit com Ashton will always be the dweeb he played on the 70s show, although there were similarities to Sheen’s character. I’ll watch it to see how they handle it.